Table 1: Goodness of fit and model selections of the best meat or poultry cost function
models.
Industry |
Model Number |
Description |
Test Variable |
Test |
Parameters |
Restric- |
G-J Value |
Model |
Meat |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
186.6 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,T)2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
159.5 |
— — ,**⅛ 27.1 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
171.5 |
12.0 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation and Process Control (S) |
II vs. IV |
15 |
6 |
173.4 |
T _ * 13.9 | |
Meat Processing |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
586.8 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,T)2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
555.9 |
— ʌ ʌ * * * 30.9 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 ' |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
563.8 |
7.9 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
II vs. IV |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
574.2 |
18.3 | |
Poultry |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
126.4 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,p2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
113.6 |
12.8 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 ' |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
121.1 |
7.5 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
II vs. IV |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
119.1 |
5.5 | |
Regu- | ||||||||
Meat |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
417.0 |
- | |
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
410.0 |
7.0 | |
Meat Processing |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
1,278 |
- | ||
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
1,228 |
_ ʌ ʌ * * * 50.0 | |
Chicken |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
348.3 |
- | ||
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
332.6 |
Σ _** 15.7 | |
* significant at the 90% level, ** significant at the 95% level, *** significant at the 99% level
1 Model I: base model consisting of prices (P) and pounds of output (LB) and denoted (P,LB).
2 Model II: Adds technology (T) and sanitation and process control (S) to (P,LB) to make
(P,LB,S,T).
3 Model III: Removes T from II to make (P,LB,S).
4 Model IV; Removes S from II to make (P,LB,T).
21
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
3. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
4. Text of a letter
5. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
10. WP RR 17 - Industrial relations in the transport sector in the Netherlands