Table 1: Goodness of fit and model selections of the best meat or poultry cost function
models.
Industry |
Model Number |
Description |
Test Variable |
Test |
Parameters |
Restric- |
G-J Value |
Model |
Meat |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
186.6 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,T)2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
159.5 |
— — ,**⅛ 27.1 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
171.5 |
12.0 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation and Process Control (S) |
II vs. IV |
15 |
6 |
173.4 |
T _ * 13.9 | |
Meat Processing |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
586.8 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,T)2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
555.9 |
— ʌ ʌ * * * 30.9 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 ' |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
563.8 |
7.9 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
II vs. IV |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
574.2 |
18.3 | |
Poultry |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
126.4 |
- | |
II_________ |
(P,LB,S,p2 |
Both (T,S) |
I vs II |
21_________ |
11 |
113.6 |
12.8 | |
III |
(P,LB,S) 3 ' |
Technology (T) |
II vs. III |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
121.1 |
7.5 | |
IV |
(P,LB,T) 4 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
II vs. IV |
15__________ |
_6_______ |
119.1 |
5.5 | |
Regu- | ||||||||
Meat |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
- |
417.0 |
- | |
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
410.0 |
7.0 | |
Meat Processing |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
1,278 |
- | ||
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
1,228 |
_ ʌ ʌ * * * 50.0 | |
Chicken |
J_____ |
P,LB1 |
- |
10_________ |
348.3 |
- | ||
III |
(P,LB,R) 3 |
Sanitation (S)_______ |
I vs. III |
15__________ |
5 |
332.6 |
Σ _** 15.7 | |
* significant at the 90% level, ** significant at the 95% level, *** significant at the 99% level
1 Model I: base model consisting of prices (P) and pounds of output (LB) and denoted (P,LB).
2 Model II: Adds technology (T) and sanitation and process control (S) to (P,LB) to make
(P,LB,S,T).
3 Model III: Removes T from II to make (P,LB,S).
4 Model IV; Removes S from II to make (P,LB,T).
21
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
3. The name is absent
4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
5. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
6. Voting by Committees under Constraints
7. The name is absent
8. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
9. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
10. FASTER TRAINING IN NONLINEAR ICA USING MISEP