The name is absent



distinction, on the one hand, between intrinsic and extrinsic attributes, and, on the
other, among search, experience and credence attributes. It has to be noted that
some attributes, typically considered as credence items, such as breeding and
feeding methods, age, breed , sex and category of the animal, fattening and
conformation of the carcass, can be translated into search attributes by means of
the application of the voluntary labelling scheme introduced by Regulation EC
1760/2000.

Table 1. Quality attributes of beef

Intrinsic____________________________________________

Extrinsic______________________________________________________

Search

Colour, fat content, fat lump, fat rim,
marbling, cut of meat, age**, breed**, sex**
and category**

Brand, origin certification, organic production methods,
PDO/PGI certifications, origin information (country of
born, fattening, slaughtering and cutting)*, traceability
identification number or code*, feeding methods**,
breeding methods**, fattening**, conformation**,
purchase location, price, conservation, packaging____________

Experience

Tenderness, smell, flavour, taste, freshness ,
juiciness_____________________________________________

Credence

Freshness

Use of hormonal growth promotants, use of antibiotics,
nutritional content (fat, cholesterol, etc.), healthiness,
environmental friendly practices, animal welfare practices.

*: mandatory labelling system of beef products

**: information to be added by means of the voluntary labelling system of beef products
Source : our own elaborations on Becker (2000).

However, many researches have noted that the level of correspondence between
expected and experienced quality of beef product is fairly low, leading to
consumer’ s un- satisfaction and uncertainty . This is why brands and labels on the
one hand, and reliance on shopkeeper on the other often serve as a reliable and
predictive quality and safety cues to the consumer’ s decision process. Hence the
important role of information systems in order to communicate food product
characteristics based basically on credence aspects. Confidence and trust on carried
information depend on the information source. However, the attempt to overcome
information asymmetry between final handler and consumer through labelling or
branding implies an incentive for traceability, as superior solution to avoid
uncertainty on provided information. Therefore, on this paper we analyse to what
extent are consumers really aware of traceability and it is perceived as a new route
to provide consumers credible product and process information.

3.1. Aim of the study

In the framework of a large European Research Project, TRACE, the objective of this
paper is to give a comprehensive overview of the currently state- of- art of beef
traceability in two Mediterranean Countries, Italy and Spain, based on the results of
an exhaustive literature review and qualitative research by means of focus group
technique. Although traceability is now mandatory for all food products, analysis
will be focused on beef since it has a longer history linked to the implementation of
traceability in Europe.

4. Methodology and Results: literature review and focus groups

As first stage of the project, an exhaustive literature review of existing papers was
arranged aiming to comprehend current state- of- art of the research of traceability
from consumer perspective. This step also had the objective to identify open fields

6



More intriguing information

1. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
2. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
3. Moffett and rhetoric
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
8. The name is absent
9. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
10. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach