Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights

Eurocare (2003). Study to assess the impact of future options for the future reform of the sugar
common market organisation, Bonn, unpublished document.

Frandsen, S., Jensen H., Yu W. and Walter-Jorgensen, A. (2003). Reform of the EU sugar policy:
price cuts versus quota reductions. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(1): 1-26.

Garside, B., Hills, T., Marques, J.C., Seeger, C. and Thiel C. (2004). Who Gains from Sugar Quotas?.
Reprot, London School of Economics and Overseas Development Institute DESTIN DV406 Research
Project:

Gohin, A. and Moschini, G. (2005). Evaluating the Market and Welfare Impacts of Agricultural
Policies in Developed Countries: Comparison of Partial and General Equilibrium Measures. .
Forthcoming in Review of Agricultural Economics

Gohin, A. and Latruffe, L. (2006). The Luxembourg Common Agricultural Poliy Reform and the
European Food Industries: What’s at Stake. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 173-192

Hertel, T.W. (2002). Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Agricultural and Resource Policies. In
Gardner B.L. and Rausser G.C., eds, Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol 2A, North Holland.

Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P.C.B., Schmidt P., and Shin Y. (1992): Testing the Null Hypothesis of
Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics 54, 159-178.

Kopp, J. and de Gorter, H. (2005). The Economics of Cross-Subsidization: Implications ofthe WTO
Panels on EU sugar and Canadian Dairy. Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade
Research Consortium symposium ‘Pressures for Agricultural Policy Reform”, Sevilla, Spain, June 21-
25.

LMC (2004). Addressing the impact of preference erosion in sugar on developing countries. Study
prepared for DFID, Landel Mills Corporation International and Oxford Policy Management London.

Mahler P. (1994) Efficiency losses as a result of insufficient structural adjustments due to the EC
sugar regime: The case of Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 21(2), 199-218

Mitchell, D. (2005). Sugar Policies : Opportunity for Change. In Aksoy A. And Beghin J.C. Global
Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. The World Bank.

OECD, (2005). An Analysis of Sugar Policy Reform and Trade Liberalisation. Organisation de
Coopération Economique, Paris

Peterson, E., Hertel, T. and Preckel, P. (1994). A General Equilibrium Framework for the Food
Marketing System. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, 37-57.

Poonyth, D., Westhoff, P., Womack, A. and Adams, G. (2000). Impacts of WTO restrictions on
subsidized EU sugar exports. Agricultural Economics, 22: 233-245.

Rozakis, S. and Sourie, J.C. (2005). Micro-economic modelling of biofuel system in France to
determine tax exemption policy under uncertainty. Energy Policy, 33(2), 171-182

Sourie, J.C., Treguer, D., Rozakis, S. (2005). L'ambivalence des filières biocarburants. INRA
Sciences Sociales, 2, Décembre, pp 1-8.

Revoredo C., Renwick A., Reader M. (2005) UK sugar beet farm productivity under different reform
scenarios: a farm level analysis. Paper presented at the EAAE Congress, Copenhaguen

Roumasset, J.A. (1977). Risk Aversion, Indirect Utility Functions, and Market Failure. In Roumasset
J.A., Boussard J.M., and Singh I. (eds): Risk, Uncertainty and Agricultural Development, Agricultural
Development Council, 93-113.

Schmidt, H. (2003). Evaluation spezieller institutioneller Ausgestaltungen der
EUZuckermarktordnung, Agrimedia, Bergen.

Swedish Competition Authority (2002). Sweet Fifteen: The Competition on the EU Sugar Markets.
Report 2002:7.

23

<<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   >>

More intriguing information