Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights



Appendix. Econometric procedures and estimates

Stationnary tests

The time series used in the econometric estimations were tested for stationarity using the
augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) with drift as well as with the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-
Schmidt-Shin (KPPSS) tests for stationarity (Kwiatkowski et al 1992). As it is well known,
none of these tests is fully conclusive, especially when used on small samples. The ADF
tests for the rejection of non stationarity. If the value of this statistic is lower than the critical
value of -3.6, then this means that we can reject at 5% level of confidence the hypothesis of
non-stationarity. KPSS test has stationarity as the null hypothesis and the unit root as the
alternative. Again, if the value of this statistic is lower than the critical value of 0.146, we can
not reject at the 5% level of confidence the hypothesis of stationarity.

Table A1 shows the values of these two tests for all variables estimated (sugar beet acreage
by Member States) as well as for the prices entering the French equation. The number of lag
in the ADF test is determined according to the Durbin Watson test. As it is often the case,
these two tests are not always consistent. For instance, according to the ADF test, we can not
reject the assumption that the UK sugar beet area variable is non stationary but according to
the KPSS test, we can not reject the hypothesis of stationarity. It appears in Table A1 that for
no series did we find the two tests in favor of non stationarity. With this fragile conclusion,
we are only able to be cautious about the inferences on our econometric estimates.

Table A1. Augmented Dickey Fuller and KPSS tests

ADF test
(critical value <-3.60)_______

KPSS test
(critical value <0.146)___________

Sugar beet areas in
France

-4.50

0.113

UK

0.06

0.142

Belgium

-4.30

0.148

Spain

-2.77

0.096

Italy

-2.37

0.149

Netherland

-4.37

0.106

Germany (with dummy for 1991)

-9.45

0.127

Prices in the French equation:

1/PW

-14.42

0.184

P2/PW

-4.43

0.121

(P1-P2)/PW_____________________

-2.86________________________

0.114_________________________

Econometric estimation

The equation that is estimated corresponds to (7) in the paper. The series are annual data
from 1981. Data sources include Eurostat for acreages and p
2 (spot sugar prices, London) is
from the annual report of the Confédération Générale de la Betterave. Data for p
1 including
various taxes are taken from van der Linde et al (2002) and from Confédération Générale de
la Betterave. All prices were deflated by the GNP price using Eurostat data. Price and yields
are expressed as an arithmetic average over the past three years. Various specifications with
trends and lagged variables were tested, but the naïve expectation specification fit the data
best.

25



More intriguing information

1. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
2. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
3. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
4. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
5. The name is absent
6. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
7. The name is absent
8. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
9. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
10. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?