Table 1 Annual Output and Export of the Wfenzhou Footwear Industry
Year |
Annual output value |
Growth rate ( %) |
Export value |
Growth rate ( %) |
2001 |
249 |
- |
462 |
- |
2002 |
263 |
5.62 |
667 |
44.37 |
2003 |
307 |
16.73 |
837 |
25.49 |
2004 |
346 |
12.70 |
1149 |
37.28 |
It is interesting to observe that the footwear cluster formed in Wenzhou where, despite having
neither a legal nor a financial system which is well developed by existing standards, private
enterprises have mushroomed in the last two and a half decades. To address the questions
mentioned in Section 1, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Zhejiang
University conducted a joint survey in Wenzhou.
The investigation work was conducted by collecting related literatures and documents andby
interviewing numerous individuals including as key persons in the local societies, competent
government authorities as well as some senior predecessors and insiders. Concurrently, we
conducted further informal interviews with managers of some middle-small enterprises of the
footwear cluster to design and pretest our questionnair es and then finished them. From July to
October 2005, we conducted the formal field survey, covering the key footwear production bases,
including the first phase and second phase “Footwear City of China” industrial park in the
Lucheng district of Wenzhou City, the Shuangyu Industrial Park of Lucheng District, the Oubei
Township of Yongjia County and the Shenting Township of Ruian City and so on. We randomly
selected our investigation targets from the list provided by local government or administrative
departments of the industrial parks, and send one investigator to talk to the key responsible people
face to face and to finally fill in the questionnaire according to the information obtained. We
surveyed 140 existing footwear enterprises 6 including enterprises producing finished products or
parts of supplies, which account for 2.77% of the total enterprises of Wenzhou footwear cluster.
Table 2 presents the summary statistics of the survey.
Table 2 Statistics summary of the survey
Types of products |
Number of |
Total |
Sample/ total |
Minimum** |
Maximum** |
Mean** |
Std ** |
Final products* |
121 |
4000 |
3.03% |
3 |
3500 |
459 |
547 |
Footwear sole |
4 |
380 |
1.05% |
30 |
1100 |
570 |
612 |
Footwear last |
2 |
168 |
1.19% |
10 |
80 |
45 |
49 |
Leather |
4 |
200 |
2.00% |
8 |
170 |
62 |
74 |
Accessories & |
7 |
100 |
7.00% |
30 |
200 |
75 |
66 |
ornamental Materials Footwear Machinery |
2 |
200 |
1.00% |
90 |
500 |
295 |
290 |
6 We also attempt to investigate those founders of footwear enterprises who have vanished or changed their
businesses or had to give up due to the difficulty.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
4. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
5. The name is absent
6. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
7. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
8. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
9. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
10. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?