(14) is satisfied and the transversality conditions hold; (vi) the monetary policy rule is
satisfied, (22) or (23); along with the foreign counterparts for (i)-(vi) and conditions (5),
(6), (20) and (21).
2.6 Local Equilibrium Dynamics
In order to analyze the equilibrium dynamics of the model, a first-order Taylor approxi-
mation is taken around a steady state to replace the non-linear equilibrium system with
an approximation which is linear.9 We employ the Aoki (1981) decomposition which
decomposes the two-country model into two decoupled dynamic systems: the aggregate
system that captures the properties of the closed world economy10 and the difference
system that portrays the open-economy dimension. Consequently for the equilibrium to
be determinate it must be the case that there is a unique solution both for cross-country
differences and world aggregates. The complete linearized system of equations is sum-
marized in Table 1. Note that since money balances are separable, the money demand
equation and its foreign equivalent are irrelevant for equilibrium determinacy and are sub-
sequently ignored. In what follows below it will also be convenient to define x ≡ KL. The
parameters of the model are as follows: σ > 0 measures the intertemporal substitution
elasticity of consumption; φ > 0 measures the inverse of the Frisch labor supply elasticity;
0 < α < 1 measures the production input share of intermediate firms; θ > 0 measures
the elasticity of substitution between aggregate home and foreign goods; λ > 1 is the
degree of monopolistic competition in the intermediate firm sector; Λ1 ≡ (1-ψ)ψ1-βψ) > 0
is the real marginal cost elasticity of inflation, where 0 < β < 1 is the discount factor and
0 < ψ < 1 is the degree of price stickiness; and a ∈ {(0, 0.5) ∪ (0.5, 1)} is the degree of
trade openness measured by the relative share of intermediate imports used in final good
production (1 - a).11
9To be precise the model is linearized around a symmetric steady state in which prices in the two countries
are equal and constant (Ph = Pf = P = P = Ph = Pf). Then by definition inflation is zero
(∏ = ∏* = 1), and the steady state terms of trade and nominal and real exchange rates are T = e = Q = 1.
10The choice of which index of inflation each monetary authority targets is irrelevant for the aggregate
system. This follows since world aggregate inflation (πW ) is given by
W = π + π* = πh + π*f
π ^^ 2 ~ 2 '
11The analysis does not consider the case when a = 0.5 since this would imply that purchasing power parity
(PPP) is satisfied and consequently the linearized inflation equation ∏R = (2a — 1)πR(h-f ) +2(1 — a)∆et
11
More intriguing information
1. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE2. The name is absent
3. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
4. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
5. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
6. Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?
7. The name is absent
8. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
9. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
10. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland