Table 4: Multinomial Logit Estimates
|
(1) Share-Rent |
(2) Fixed-Rent | ||||||
|
coeff |
t-stat P(1)ZP(0) |
coeff |
t-stat |
P(2)ZP(0) |
P(2)ZP(1) | ||
|
Contract Choice Equation | |||||||
|
Constant |
-1.680 |
-4.46 |
-6.045 |
-7.56 | |||
|
land owned - paddy |
-2.216 |
-26.17 |
0.109 |
-0.809 |
-13.44 |
0.445 |
4.083 |
|
land owned - highland |
-0.055 |
-2.52 |
0.947 |
-0.222 |
-5.12 |
0.801 |
0.846 |
|
household size |
0.051 |
2.99 |
1.052 |
0.100 |
3.85 |
1.105 |
1.050 |
|
male adults (%) |
0.285 |
1.60 |
1.329 |
0.895 |
3.35 |
2.447 |
1.840 |
|
female adults (%) |
0.222 |
1.10 |
1.248 |
-0.479 |
-1.44 |
0.619 |
0.496 |
|
tractors owned |
0.574 |
2.03 |
1.775 |
0.995 |
4.62 |
2.704 |
1.523 |
|
bullocks owned |
0.081 |
4.37 |
1.085 |
-0.017 |
-0.46 |
0.984 |
0.907 |
|
% of students |
-0.423 |
-2.34 |
0.655 |
-0.795 |
-2.81 |
0.451 |
0.689 |
|
education of head |
0.083 |
2.71 |
1.086 |
0.128 |
2.66 |
1.136 |
1.046 |
|
education squared |
-0.010 |
-3.75 |
0.990 |
-0.012 |
-2.99 |
0.988 |
0.998 |
|
sex of head |
0.534 |
4.85 |
1.706 |
0.189 |
1.12 |
1.208 |
0.708 |
|
ethnic group |
0.492 |
1.58 |
1.636 |
1.846 |
2.55 |
6.334 |
3.871 |
|
agricultural household |
-0.079 |
-1.02 |
0.924 |
-0.145 |
-1.18 |
0.865 |
0.937 |
|
fisheries and livestock |
0.283 |
4.06 |
1.327 |
0.533 |
5.25 |
1.704 |
1.284 |
|
skill |
0.041 |
1.07 |
1.042 |
0.223 |
4.03 |
1.250 |
1.199 |
|
dry zone |
-0.313 |
-3.81 |
0.732 |
1.066 |
8.08 |
2.905 |
3.971 |
|
hills |
0.416 |
5.75 |
1.516 |
0.264 |
1.78 |
1.302 |
0.859 |
|
no. observations |
8428 | ||||||
|
log likelihood |
-5053.94 | ||||||
|
Land Extent Equations | |||||||
|
Constant |
0.888 |
0.98 |
7.954 |
2.95 | |||
|
land owned - paddy |
0.805 |
1.58 |
0.840 |
4.51 | |||
|
land owned - highland |
0.022 |
1.05 |
0.040 |
0.58 | |||
|
household size |
0.038 |
1.84 |
0.018 |
0.43 | |||
|
male adults (%) |
-0.032 |
-0.16 |
-0.416 |
-0.97 | |||
|
female adults (%) |
0.260 |
1.15 |
0.353 |
0.77 | |||
|
tractors owned |
0.603 |
1.67 |
-0.292 |
-1.17 | |||
|
bullocks owned |
0.006 |
0.19 |
0.031 |
0.66 | |||
|
% of students |
0.049 |
0.24 |
0.242 |
0.64 | |||
|
education of head |
-0.050 |
-1.34 |
-0.178 |
-2.59 | |||
|
education squared |
0.008 |
2.24 |
0.018 |
3.12 | |||
|
sex of head |
-0.111 |
-0.62 |
0.095 |
0.47 | |||
|
ethnic group |
0.483 |
1.36 |
-1.806 |
-1.94 | |||
|
agricultural household |
0.226 |
2.73 |
0.261 |
1.68 | |||
|
fisheries and livestock |
-0.093 |
-1.07 |
-0.686 |
-3.69 | |||
|
skill |
-0.051 |
-1.27 |
-0.021 |
-0.21 | |||
|
dry zone |
0.657 |
4.47 |
-0.497 |
-1.23 | |||
|
hills |
-0.093 |
-0.76 |
0.148 |
0.86 | |||
|
lambda |
-0.828 |
-1.34 |
-2.597 |
-3.44 | |||
|
number of obs. |
1851 |
535 | |||||
|
r-squared |
0.042 |
0.237 | |||||
58
More intriguing information
1. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?2. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
3. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
4. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
5. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
6. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
10. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis