Table 6: Bivariate Probit (Truncated Sample) Estimates
_________(1) Share-Rent_________ |
__________(2) Fixed-Rent__________ | ||||||
hire=1 |
share=1 |
hire=1 |
fixed=1 | ||||
coeff |
t-stat |
coeff t-stat |
coeff |
t-stat |
coeff |
t-stat | |
Contract Choice Equation | |||||||
Constant |
-1.093 |
-6.67 |
0.063 0.07 |
-1.092 |
-6.79 |
-1.722 |
-1.43 |
land owned - paddy |
-0.707 |
-52.90 |
-0.544 -3.21 |
-0.707 |
-51.57 |
0.413 |
1.89 |
land owned - highland |
-0.066 |
-12.25 |
0.019 0.53 |
-0.066 |
-12.12 |
-0.011 |
-0.30 |
household size |
0.042 |
4.74 |
-0.001 -0.05 |
0.042 |
4.76 |
0.016 |
0.65 |
male adults (%) |
0.370 |
4.01 |
-0.097 -0.44 |
0.370 |
3.98 |
0.116 |
0.49 |
female adults (%) |
-0.017 |
-0.16 |
0.251 1.42 |
-0.016 |
-0.15 |
-0.300 |
-1.42 |
tractors owned |
0.616 |
7.53 |
-0.074 -0.36 |
0.615 |
7.53 |
0.083 |
0.34 |
bullocks owned |
0.030 |
4.58 |
0.069 3.20 |
0.030 |
4.60 |
-0.093 |
-4.12 |
% of students |
-0.327 |
-3.44 |
-0.130 -0.78 |
-0.330 |
-3.47 |
-0.113 |
-0.53 |
education of head |
0.067 |
4.18 |
0.026 0.83 |
0.067 |
4.16 |
0.007 |
0.17 |
education squared |
-0.008 |
-5.58 |
-0.003 -1.06 |
-0.008 |
-5.58 |
0.000 |
0.13 |
sex of head |
0.259 |
4.71 |
0.287 2.87 |
0.259 |
4.71 |
-0.244 |
-2.06 |
agricultural household |
-0.058 |
-1.35 |
-0.061 -0.99 |
-0.058 |
-1.36 |
-0.041 |
-0.55 |
fisheries and livestock |
0.226 |
6.42 |
-0.025 -0.25 |
0.227 |
6.45 |
0.074 |
0.64 |
ethnic group |
0.255 |
2.06 |
0.056 0.24 |
0.256 |
2.12 |
0.761 |
1.93 |
skill |
0.062 |
3.22 |
-0.035 -0.83 |
0.062 |
3.22 |
0.085 |
1.62 |
dry zone |
0.123 |
2.86 |
-0.527 -3.23 |
0.122 |
2.84 |
0.601 |
3.49 |
hills |
0.229 |
5.39 |
0.158 1.90 |
0.227 |
5.36 |
-0.134 |
-1.35 |
rho |
0.540 |
1.29 |
-0.469 |
-1.07 | |||
no. observations |
8428 |
8428 | |||||
log likelihood |
-5908.61 |
-5516.33 | |||||
Land Extent Equation | |||||||
Constant |
-1.241 |
-0.82 |
3.992 |
2.13 | |||
land owned - paddy |
-0.242 |
-0.47 |
0.711 |
4.37 | |||
land owned - highland |
-0.009 |
-0.25 |
-0.096 |
-1.90 | |||
household size |
0.063 |
2.58 |
0.057 |
1.48 | |||
male adults (%) |
0.088 |
0.39 |
-0.072 |
-0.19 | |||
female adults (%) |
0.382 |
1.66 |
-0.021 |
-0.05 | |||
tractors owned |
0.689 |
2.16 |
-0.119 |
-0.78 | |||
bullocks owned |
0.054 |
1.34 |
0.042 |
0.86 | |||
% of students |
-0.168 |
-0.67 |
-0.040 |
-0.11 | |||
education of head |
0.000 |
0.00 |
-0.124 |
-1.91 | |||
education squared |
0.002 |
0.47 |
0.015 |
2.61 | |||
sex of head |
0.208 |
0.86 |
0.085 |
0.41 | |||
agricultural household |
0.184 |
2.11 |
0.237 |
1.55 | |||
fisheries and livestock |
0.031 |
0.28 |
-0.458 |
-3.05 | |||
ethnic group |
0.647 |
1.66 |
-1.107 |
-1.13 | |||
skill |
-0.037 |
-0.90 |
0.074 |
0.85 | |||
dry zone |
0.388 |
2.06 |
0.082 |
0.29 | |||
hills |
0.143 |
0.89 |
0.200 |
1.10 | |||
lambda |
0.670 |
0.71 |
-1.389 |
-3.04 | |||
number of obs. |
1863 |
537 | |||||
r-squared |
0.042 |
0.226 |
60
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
5. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
10. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY