Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?



specification is an EGARCH specification with suitable lags of the variables in first differences.
Comparison of equations 2, 3 and 4 in Table 8 indicates that the set of variables found significant
for the pre-crisis period is nearly the same as that for the entire period. The coefficient of the
error correction term in Specification 4 is much smaller than in specification 2 and 3, likely
because Russian monetary authorities had less liberal policies for the exchange rate in the pre-
crisis period.32 Specification 4 will be utilized in Section 9 for out of sample forecasting.

Table 7

Poland: error correction equations (equation (5)) for real exchange rate

Coefficients Estimates
(p-value)

Variable

Specification 1
OLS
(1995:07 - 2001:09)

Specification 2

EGARCH(7, 4)

(1995:07 - 2001:09)

EC(-1)

-0.026933

-0.042708

(0.21)

(0.00)

∆log(TOT)

-0.025976

-0.018804

(0.04)

(0.00)

∆FLOW

-0.130739

-0.103030

(0.06)

(0.00)

∆log(OPEN)

0.035170

0.016684

(0.02)

(0.00)

∆log(GOV)

0.030413

0.013732

(0.18)

(0.02)

∆log(DCRE)

0. 170624

0.076929

(0.01)

(0.00)

∆log(NEER)

1.012465

0.938424

(0.00)

(0.00)

∆log(TOT(-1))

-0.003272

(0.00)

∆FLOW(-1)

-0.069762

32 The results on misalignment in section 8 below indicate that this rigid policy for the exchange rate contributed
to the currency crisis.

29



More intriguing information

1. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
2. Fertility in Developing Countries
3. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
4. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
5. Happiness in Eastern Europe
6. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
7. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
8. European Integration: Some stylised facts
9. Workforce or Workfare?
10. The name is absent