For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments



The puzzle is obvious. Most countries, including LDCs, are likely to benefit
from investment liberalization. Even when LDCs estimate losses from entering
an agreement on investment liberalization, they are free to opt out. Neverthe-
less, we observe countries (some LDCs especially) that are against the prospect
of MAI, even when they do not consider to enter. What they do object is the
eventuality that other countries form a club with liberal rules on investment.

In the following sections we present a model in which the choice of MAI mem-
bership for the single country involves the basic trade-off identified in Markusen
(1998) and the puzzle mentioned above finds a possible explanation.

3 The Model

3.1 The World Economy

We assume a world with many countries. For simplicity, we index countries by
h on a continuum of unit measure. In the world, there is also a unit continuum
of goods, indexed by i. Labor is the only production factor, and each country
has the same endowment L. Labor is perfectly mobile across sectors or firms,
and perfectly immobile across countries. Consumers are identical everywhere.
They have Cobb-Douglas preferences described by the following utility function
where C
(i) is consumption of good i. All goods are freely tradable, so, their
price is equalized worldwide.

U=


1 ln C (i)
0


di;


(1)


Production technologies are identical across sectors and countries. Each
good can be produced either out of a CRS technology by competitive firms, or
with an IRS technology by a monopolist.12 Moreover, monopolistic firms can
exploit their knowledge capital internationally by choosing the location of their
operations. Consequently, we call these firms MNEs, henceforth.

3.2 MNEs

There is a one-to-one correspondence between sectors and MNEs. So, in the
world there is a unit mass of MNEs, and the distribution of their ”headquarters”
across the world is exogenous and fixed. The share of MNEs having their home
country in country h is denoted by
μh. MNEs repatriate all their profits to the
home country.

Each MNE operates from a single plant, and is required to make a plant-
level, cost reducing, investment I before starting production. Plants have a
fixed size.13 We assume that in each plant one unit of labor is turned into

12This set up is analogous to that used in Murphy, S hleifer and Vishny (1989).

13The assumption that firms’ size is given can be justified, for instance, on the ground of
monitoring and coordination costs (see, e.g., Holmstrom and Tirole (1989)).



More intriguing information

1. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
2. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
3. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
4. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
5. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
6. The name is absent
7. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
8. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent