Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?



Overall, there are 1241 migrants in the sample distributed as follows with the following
characteristics (Table 2):

_________________________________TABLE 2_________________________________

_________________CHARACTERISTICS OF MIGRANTS_________________

MIGRATION TYPE

TEMPORARY PERMANENT

INTERNATIONAL

Number of migrants

521

562

158

(percentage)

(42%)

(45%)

(13%)

Average age of migrants

33.34

29.13

31.96

Average education of migrants (year of schooling)

1.24

5.42

6.15

Average migration spell (how many years before

1995 migrants left for the first time)

8.7

7.6

3.5

Percentage of male migrants

99.62

95.02

100

Percentage of married migrants

84.45

56.23

64.56

Percentage of single migrants_________________________

14.97

42.53

34.81

Across different categories of migration, sample migrants are predominately men, young
(around 30 years old) moving primarily to earn more money or find a job. What differs across
types of migration is the educational level of migrants, clearly higher in the case of permanent
and international migration, and in the latter cases the percentage of single migrants is also
higher than in case of temporary migration20. Eventually, international migration seems the
most recent type of moving, as sample migrants left on average around 1991, while
permanent migration started earlier and temporary migration more than eight years before
1995.

Figure 1 shows the sample average amounts of costs of moving and remittances sent back
home, by different categories of migration. Migration costs as well as remittances are directly
asked to the survey respondent, and they refer to initial costs sustained by the household to
send out a migrant (i.e. costs of travel, visa, recruiting agency etc) and the amount of money
they receive from her/him.

It is clearly evident the increase in net-returns across typologies of migration, with
international migration yielding the highest level of costs and remittances. Moreover, Tables 3
shows the percentage of migrants remitting, which is very high in all categories, suggesting a
high correspondence between migration and remittances sent back home.

20 Since the age of migrants is not very different, the single status of migrants can be considered as a ‘cost’ of
permanent and international migration.

11



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
3. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
4. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
5. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
6. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
7. The name is absent
8. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
13. The name is absent
14. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
15. The name is absent
16. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS
17. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
18. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
19. The name is absent
20. An Attempt to 2