|
____________________________________________________TABLE 4____________________________________________________ | |
|
Characteristics of farm households by migration categories | |
|
Variable_______________ |
___________NO MIGRATION_____TEMPORARY______PERMANENT____INTERNATIONAL |
|
Obs |
Mean |
St Dev. |
Obs |
Mean |
St Dev. |
Obs |
Mean |
St Dev. |
Obs |
Mean |
St Dev. | |
|
Household characteristics and assets | ||||||||||||
|
Household size (including migrants) |
2417 |
5,37 |
2,25 |
411 |
5,93 |
2,30 |
431 |
7,05 |
2,71 |
145 |
8,81 |
3,68 |
|
Average education level of hh. members |
2417 |
1,85 |
2,15 |
411 |
0,91 |
1,53 |
431 |
2,85 |
2,63 |
145 |
3,53 |
2,15 |
|
Land size (acre) |
2417 |
0,77 |
1,37 |
411 |
0,47 |
1,16 |
431 |
0,84 |
1,08 |
145 |
1,81 |
1,92 |
|
Land size (p.a.e) |
2417 |
0,18 |
0,29 |
411 |
0,09 |
0,19 |
431 |
0,15 |
0,20 |
145 |
0,25 |
0,24 |
|
Area of land operated (acre) |
2417 |
1,97 |
2,20 |
411 |
1,38 |
2,78 |
431 |
1,6 |
1,77 |
145 |
2,8 |
3,06 |
|
Area of irrigated land (acre) |
2417 |
0,89 |
1,36 |
411 |
0,31 |
0,93 |
431 |
0,39 |
0,82 |
145 |
0,62 |
0,73 |
|
Cattle owned (unit) |
2417 |
1,19 |
1,74 |
411 |
0,57 |
1,13 |
431 |
0,75 |
1,19 |
145 |
1,15 |
1,45 |
|
Cattle owned (pae) |
2417 |
0,27 |
0,39 |
411 |
0,11 |
0,20 |
431 |
0,13 |
0,23 |
145 |
0,15 |
0,18 |
|
Average number of migrants per household |
2417 |
0 |
0,00 |
411 |
1,1 |
0,34 |
431 |
1,3 |
0,61 |
145 |
1,4 |
0 .64 |
|
Income flows | ||||||||||||
|
Crop income (pae) (Taka) |
2417 |
3212,41 |
4174,99 |
411 |
1259,79 |
6882,01 |
431 |
2125,13 |
3198,34 |
145 |
3865,26 |
6450,04 |
|
Crop income as % of tot.income |
2417 |
38% |
0,28 |
411 |
20% |
0,19 |
431 |
26% |
0,21 |
145 |
22% |
0,20 |
|
Agricultural income b (pae) |
2417 |
1175,25 |
1320,58 |
411 |
628,1 |
762,97 |
431 |
922,61 |
1317,74 |
145 |
1318,19 |
1680,07 |
|
Agricultural income as % of tot.income |
2417 |
17% |
0,17 |
411 |
13% |
0,14 |
431 |
14% |
0,15 |
145 |
9% |
0,09 |
|
Off-farm income (excluding remittances) (pae) |
2417 |
3135,85 |
4110,85 |
411 |
2456,27 |
4627,52 |
431 |
1202,28 |
1970,31 |
145 |
759,16 |
1479,74 |
|
Off-farm income as % of tot.income |
2417 |
43,31% |
0,32 |
411 |
50,13% |
0,21 |
431 |
18,50% |
0,24 |
145 |
6,17% |
0,11 |
|
Income from pond (pae) |
2417 |
130,27 |
440,80 |
411 |
104,7 |
182,31 |
431 |
273,11 |
552,61 |
145 |
431,4 |
683,70 |
|
Income from pond as % of tot.income |
2417 |
2% |
0,05 |
411 |
2% |
0,04 |
431 |
4% |
0,06 |
145 |
3% |
0,04 |
|
Amount of 'temporary' remittances (pae) |
2417 |
0 |
0,00 |
411 |
785,68 |
1342,54 |
431 |
67,66 |
334,45 |
145 |
22 |
105,20 |
|
Amount of ‘permanent’ remittances (pae) |
2417 |
0 |
0,00 |
411 |
0 |
0,00 |
431 |
2619,19 |
3362,44 |
145 |
430,16 |
2488,83 |
|
Amount of ‘international’ remittances (pae) |
2417 |
0 |
0,00 |
411 |
0 |
0,00 |
431 |
0 |
0,00 |
145 |
12842,9 |
34696,75 |
|
Tot. remittances as % of tot.income |
2417 |
0 |
0,00 |
411 |
15% |
0,14 |
431 |
39% |
0,28 |
60% |
0,24 | |
|
Total gross income (pae) |
2417 |
7626,96 |
6488,28 |
411 |
5194,17 |
11673,76 |
431 |
7185,19 |
5991,46 |
145 |
19665,2 |
37887,29 |
|
Amount of total loans from Ngos (pae) |
2417 |
331,95 |
1058,65 |
411 |
121,47 |
456,05 |
431 |
46,89 |
291,73 |
145 |
23,68 |
174,66 |
|
% of hhs adopting HYVs of rice |
2417 |
24,6% |
0,47 |
411 |
15.5% |
0,36 |
431 |
15,6% |
0,36 |
145 |
18,6% |
0,39 |
|
% of poor households8________________________ |
2417 |
30,04% |
0,46 |
411 |
51,34% |
0,50 |
431 |
36,43% |
0,48 |
145 |
4,83% |
0,22 |
Pae = per adult equivalent (including migrant members)
a) The poverty line is based on the Food Adequacy Standard and has been set at 4200 Tk per (adult male equivalent) head per annum for 1994 (see Mendola 2003)
b) Agricultural income = homestead earnings, livestock, wood, straw.
13
More intriguing information
1. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools2. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
3. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
4. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
5. The name is absent
6. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
7. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
8. The name is absent
9. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
10. The name is absent