APPENDIX
Table A.1: Determinants of participation to different typologies of migration
TEMPORARY PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL
|
Marginal |
Linear |
Marginal |
Linear |
Marginal |
Linear | |
|
Number of males in the hh. |
0.013 |
0.023 |
0.014 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
|
(3.80)*** |
(3.93)*** |
(4.58)*** | ||||
|
Number of females in the hh. |
-0.003 |
-0.006 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.025 |
|
-0.84 |
-0.6 |
(4.16)*** | ||||
|
Number of children in the hh. |
-0.004 |
-0.008 |
-0.007 |
-0.012 |
0.000 |
0.007 |
|
(2.33)** |
(2.91)*** |
(2.51)** | ||||
|
Most educated in the hh |
-0.040 |
-0.065 |
0.028 |
0.046 |
0.003 |
0.018 |
|
(8.67)*** |
(5.51)*** |
(3.42)*** | ||||
|
Age of hh. head |
-0.001 |
-0.001 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.000 |
-0.003 |
|
-0.3 |
(1.84)* |
(2.48)** | ||||
|
(Age of hh.head)2 |
0.000 |
0 |
0.000 |
0 |
0.000 |
0 |
|
-0.32 |
-1.53 |
(1.86)* | ||||
|
Religion (whether it is Muslim) |
0.061 |
0.086 |
-0.004 |
-0.043 |
0.004 |
0.044 |
|
(12.08)*** |
-1.62 |
(2.78)*** | ||||
|
Land owned (pae) |
-0.130 |
-0.115 |
-0.076 |
-0.124 |
0.022 |
0.057 |
|
(3.74)*** |
(4.22)*** |
(2.65)*** | ||||
|
[Land owned (pae)]2 |
0.033 |
0.038 |
0.016 |
0.027 |
-0.015 |
-0.019 |
|
(1.94)* |
(2.96)*** |
(2.35)** | ||||
|
Cattle owned (pae) |
0.013 |
-0.034 |
-0.079 |
-0.095 |
-0.015 |
-0.072 |
|
-1.43 |
(3.65)*** |
(4.75)*** | ||||
|
[Cattle owned (pae)]2 |
-0.037 |
0.011 |
0.034 |
0.05 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
|
-0.92 |
(2.91)*** |
(3.87)*** | ||||
|
Farm equipment owned |
-0.006 |
-0.006 |
-0.008 |
-0.011 |
0.000 |
0.007 |
|
-0.8 |
-1.41 |
-0.96 | ||||
|
Whether own tubwells |
-0.012 |
0.063 |
0.036 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
-0.006 |
|
(4.52)*** |
-0.45 |
(1.87)* | ||||
|
N. of hhs. in the ‘bari’ |
0.000 |
0 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.000 |
0 |
|
-0.47 |
(1.65)* |
-0.53 | ||||
|
Self-poor assessment |
0.017 |
0.033 |
-0.006 |
-0.01 |
-0.007 |
-0.036 |
|
(2.82)*** |
-0.88 |
(5.09)*** | ||||
|
% out-temp. migrants in the village |
0.506 |
1.056 |
-0.089 |
-0.046 |
0.000 |
0.087 |
|
(4.01)*** |
-0.17 |
-0.5 | ||||
|
% out-perm. migrants in the village |
-0.471 |
-0.794 |
0.641 |
1.359 |
0.012 |
-0.033 |
|
-1.63 |
(2.76)*** |
-0.46 | ||||
|
% out-intern. migrants in the village |
-0.356 |
-0.632 |
0.213 |
0.391 |
0.098 |
0.928 |
|
-1.51 |
-0.98 |
(3.36)*** | ||||
|
Network |
-0.002 |
0.005 |
0.106 |
0.312 |
0.004 |
0.087 |
|
-0.16 |
(7.64)*** |
(2.86)*** | ||||
|
Regional dummy |
-0.206 |
-0.251 |
0.004 |
0.169 |
-0.010 |
0.006 |
|
(2.37)** |
-1.58 |
-0.08 | ||||
|
Constant |
0.213 |
-0.299 |
-0.056 | |||
|
(1.80)* |
(2.55)** |
-0.72 | ||||
|
Observations |
3404 |
3404 |
3404 | |||
|
Robust - statistics in parentheses; * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%_______ | ||||||
39
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Hemmnisse für die Vernetzungen von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft abbauen
3. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
4. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
5. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
6. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
7. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
8. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
9. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
10. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century