Table A.2: Impact of different typologies of migration on HYVs adoption
|
(1) |
(2)____________ |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) | |
|
Estimator: |
ivprob- coeff._______ |
ivprob- marg. effects |
3sls |
2sls ________________________________________________________ι |
2sls- |
|
Temporary migration |
-0.963 |
-0.226 |
-0.23 |
-0.214 |
-0.214 |
|
(2.05)** |
(2.05)** |
(1.98)** |
(1.80)* |
(1.76)* | |
|
Permanent migration |
-1.509 |
-0.293 |
-0.269 |
-0.309 |
-0.309 |
|
(3.65)*** |
(3.65)*** |
(2.69)*** |
(3.02)*** |
(2.85)*** | |
|
International migration |
2.68 |
0.554 |
0.577 |
0.509 |
0.509 |
|
(3.32)*** |
(3.32)*** |
(2.93)*** |
(2.52)** |
(2.32)** | |
|
Number of males in the hh. |
0.07 |
0.022 |
0.015 |
0.019 |
0.019 |
|
(1.82)* |
(1.82)* |
-1.56 |
(1.95)* |
(1.77)* | |
|
Number of females in the hh. |
-0.008 |
-0.003 |
-0.005 |
-0.001 |
-0.001 |
|
-0.18 |
-0.18 |
-0.41 |
-0.07 |
-0.07 | |
|
Number of children in the hh. |
0.042 |
0.013 |
0.012 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
|
(2.06)** |
(2.06)** |
(2.29)** |
(2.54)** |
(2.47)** | |
|
Average years of schooling in the | |||||
|
hh. |
0.005 |
0.002 |
-0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
-0.28 |
-0.28 |
-0.11 |
-0.2 |
-0.19 | |
|
Percentage of land owned |
0.03 |
0.009 |
0.004 |
0.016 |
0.016 |
|
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
-0.59 |
(2.02)** |
(2.60)*** | |
|
Amount of land operated |
0.47 |
0.15 |
0.144 |
0.156 |
0.156 |
|
(4.66)*** |
(4.66)*** |
(6.08)*** |
(6.14)*** |
(4.82)*** | |
|
Percentage of temple land |
-0.079 |
-0.025 |
-0.026 |
-0.028 |
-0.028 |
|
-1.57 |
-1.57 |
(2.12)** |
(2.16)** |
-1.21 | |
|
Percentage of cash-in land |
-0.046 |
-0.015 |
0.003 |
-0.015 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.19 |
-0.19 |
-0.06 |
-0.23 |
-0.21 | |
|
Percentage of mortgaged-out land |
-0.616 |
-0.197 |
-0.056 |
-0.113 |
-0.113 |
|
(4.36)*** |
(4.36)*** |
(2.05)** |
(3.92)*** |
(3.60)*** | |
|
Cattle owned (pae) |
0.365 |
0.117 |
0.117 |
0.108 |
0.108 |
|
(3.85)*** |
(3.85)*** |
(4.61)*** |
(4.22)*** |
(3.74)*** | |
|
Farm equipment owned |
-0.008 |
-0.002 |
0.008 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
|
-0.19 |
-0.19 |
-0.78 |
-0.36 |
-0.27 | |
|
Power means of ploughing |
0.086 |
0.028 |
0.038 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
-1.34 |
-1.34 |
(2.45)** |
(1.80)* |
(1.75)* | |
|
Land-labor ratio |
-0.283 |
-0.09 |
-0.059 |
-0.071 |
-0.071 |
|
(2.40)** |
(2.40)** |
(2.16)** |
(2.53)** |
(2.44)** | |
|
Whether own pond |
0.224 |
0.072 |
0.064 |
0.054 |
0.054 |
|
(2.60)*** |
(2.60)*** |
(3.27)*** |
(2.56)** |
(2.71)*** | |
|
Self-poor assessment |
-0.211 |
-0.067 |
-0.071 |
-0.073 |
-0.073 |
|
(2.90)*** |
(2.90)*** |
(3.80)*** |
(3.87)*** |
(3.84)*** | |
|
Region dummy |
0.345 |
0.111 |
0.133 |
0.121 |
0.121 |
|
(2.37)** |
(2.37)** |
(3.69)*** |
(3.27)*** |
(3.20)*** | |
|
Percentage of irrigated land |
1.029 |
0.328 |
0.286 |
0.286 |
0.286 |
|
(10.46)*** |
(10.46)*** |
(12.13)*** |
(11.20)*** |
(11.10)*** | |
|
Constant |
-1.442 |
0.036 |
0.038 |
0.038 | |
|
(7.34)*** |
-0.73 |
-0.77 |
-0.73 | ||
|
Observations_____________________ |
_______3404 |
_________3404 |
_______3404 |
3404 |
_______3404 |
Absolute value of z statistics in parentheses (robust in model (5) accounting for potential heteroscedasticity)
* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%
41
More intriguing information
1. Nonparametric cointegration analysis2. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
3. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
4. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
5. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
6. Yield curve analysis
7. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
8. The name is absent
9. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
10. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.