Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?



Table A.2: Impact of different typologies of migration on HYVs adoption

(1)

(2)____________

(3)

(4)

(5)

Estimator:

ivprob-

coeff._______

ivprob-

marg. effects

3sls

2sls

________________________________________________________ι

2sls-
robust s.e.

Temporary migration

-0.963

-0.226

-0.23

-0.214

-0.214

(2.05)**

(2.05)**

(1.98)**

(1.80)*

(1.76)*

Permanent migration

-1.509

-0.293

-0.269

-0.309

-0.309

(3.65)***

(3.65)***

(2.69)***

(3.02)***

(2.85)***

International migration

2.68

0.554

0.577

0.509

0.509

(3.32)***

(3.32)***

(2.93)***

(2.52)**

(2.32)**

Number of males in the hh.

0.07

0.022

0.015

0.019

0.019

(1.82)*

(1.82)*

-1.56

(1.95)*

(1.77)*

Number of females in the hh.

-0.008

-0.003

-0.005

-0.001

-0.001

-0.18

-0.18

-0.41

-0.07

-0.07

Number of children in the hh.

0.042

0.013

0.012

0.013

0.013

(2.06)**

(2.06)**

(2.29)**

(2.54)**

(2.47)**

Average years of schooling in the

hh.

0.005

0.002

-0.001

0.001

0.001

-0.28

-0.28

-0.11

-0.2

-0.19

Percentage of land owned

0.03

0.009

0.004

0.016

0.016

-0.6

-0.6

-0.59

(2.02)**

(2.60)***

Amount of land operated

0.47

0.15

0.144

0.156

0.156

(4.66)***

(4.66)***

(6.08)***

(6.14)***

(4.82)***

Percentage of temple land

-0.079

-0.025

-0.026

-0.028

-0.028

-1.57

-1.57

(2.12)**

(2.16)**

-1.21

Percentage of cash-in land

-0.046

-0.015

0.003

-0.015

-0.015

-0.19

-0.19

-0.06

-0.23

-0.21

Percentage of mortgaged-out land

-0.616

-0.197

-0.056

-0.113

-0.113

(4.36)***

(4.36)***

(2.05)**

(3.92)***

(3.60)***

Cattle owned (pae)

0.365

0.117

0.117

0.108

0.108

(3.85)***

(3.85)***

(4.61)***

(4.22)***

(3.74)***

Farm equipment owned

-0.008

-0.002

0.008

0.004

0.004

-0.19

-0.19

-0.78

-0.36

-0.27

Power means of ploughing

0.086

0.028

0.038

0.03

0.03

-1.34

-1.34

(2.45)**

(1.80)*

(1.75)*

Land-labor ratio

-0.283

-0.09

-0.059

-0.071

-0.071

(2.40)**

(2.40)**

(2.16)**

(2.53)**

(2.44)**

Whether own pond

0.224

0.072

0.064

0.054

0.054

(2.60)***

(2.60)***

(3.27)***

(2.56)**

(2.71)***

Self-poor assessment

-0.211

-0.067

-0.071

-0.073

-0.073

(2.90)***

(2.90)***

(3.80)***

(3.87)***

(3.84)***

Region dummy

0.345

0.111

0.133

0.121

0.121

(2.37)**

(2.37)**

(3.69)***

(3.27)***

(3.20)***

Percentage of irrigated land

1.029

0.328

0.286

0.286

0.286

(10.46)***

(10.46)***

(12.13)***

(11.20)***

(11.10)***

Constant

-1.442

0.036

0.038

0.038

(7.34)***

-0.73

-0.77

-0.73

Observations_____________________

_______3404

_________3404

_______3404

3404

_______3404

Absolute value of z statistics in parentheses (robust in model (5) accounting for potential heteroscedasticity)
* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

41



More intriguing information

1. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
2. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung
3. On Evolution of God-Seeking Mind
4. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
5. The name is absent
6. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
7. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
8. The name is absent
9. SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
10. The name is absent
11. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
12. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
13. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
14. European Integration: Some stylised facts
15. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
16. The name is absent
17. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
18. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
19. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
20. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species