Trade Openness and Volatility *
Julian di Giovanni
Andrei A. Levchenko
International Monetary Fund
June 22, 2006
Abstract
This paper examines the mechanisms through which trade openness affects output
volatility using an industry-level panel dataset of manufacturing production and trade.
The main results are threefold. First, sectors more open to international trade are
more volatile. Second, trade leads to increased specialization. These two forces act
to increase aggregate volatility. Third, sectors which are more open to trade are less
correlated with the rest of the economy, an effect that acts to reduce overall volatility.
The point estimates indicate that each of the three effects has an appreciable impact on
aggregate volatility. Added together they imply that the overall effect of trade open-
ness is positive and economically significant. This impact also varies a great deal with
country characteristics. We estimate that the same increase in openness raises aggre-
gate volatility five times more in developing countries compared to developed ones.
Finally, we find that the marginal impact of openness on volatility roughly doubled in
the last thirty years, implying that trade exerts a larger influence on volatility over time.
JEL Classifications: F15, F40
Keywords: Trade, Output Volatility, Specialization, Comovement, Sector-Level Data
*We would like to thank Fernando Broner, Andre Faria, Jean Imbs, Ayhan Kose, Akito Matsumoto,
Enrique Mendoza, Eswar Prasad, Petia Topalova, Jaume Ventura, workshop and conference participants at
IMF, Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano/CEPR Conference on Trade, Industrialization and Development (Chi-
anti), CREI/World Bank/CEPR Conference on the Growth and Welfare Consequences of Macroeconomic
Volatility (Barcelona), NBER IFM and ITI meetings, IMF Research Conference on Trade, and especially
Romain Ranciere, for helpful suggestions. Priyanka Malhotra provided expert research assistance. The views
expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the International Monetary
Fund, its Executive Board, or its management. Correspondence: International Monetary Fund, 700 19th
Street NW, Washington, DC, 20431, USA. E-mail: JdiGiovanni@imf.org, ALevchenko@imf.org.
More intriguing information
1. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY2. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
3. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
4. The name is absent
5. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
6. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
7. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
8. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
9. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
10. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE