Table 3: Dependence on group for income
Dependent variable: % of total income coming from group
[1] [2] [3] [4]
|
Female |
11.44** 11.06** (4.84) (4.84) |
12.35** |
11.14** |
|
Married |
-1.58 -1.39 |
-1.39 |
-.80 |
|
(2.97) (2.92) |
(3.00) |
(3.08) | |
|
Age |
-1.05 -1.05 |
-.94 |
-.34 |
|
(.73) (.73) |
(.54) |
(.74) | |
|
Age squared |
.011 .012 |
.011 |
.005 |
|
(.008) (.008) |
(.008) |
(.009) | |
|
Educ1-8 |
-3.88 -4.05 |
-5.21 |
-6.84 |
|
(4.52) (4.54) |
(4.81) |
(4.94) | |
|
Educ Form1-4 |
-4.72 -5.14 |
-6.70 |
-9.45* |
|
(5.11) (5.19) |
(5.39) |
(5.50) | |
|
Educ Advanced |
-7.84 -8.02 |
-9.51 |
-12.34 |
|
(10.55) (10.37) |
(10.50) |
(9.71) | |
|
# years in group |
-.53 |
-.48 |
-.60 |
|
(2.14) |
(2.17) |
(2.17) | |
|
(# years in group)^2 |
-.07 |
-.07 |
-.06 |
|
(.16) |
(.16) |
(.16) | |
|
# years resident |
.266 |
.24 |
.19 |
|
(.191) |
(.20) |
(.21) | |
|
Kikuyu |
2.70 |
1.68 | |
|
(7.62) |
(7.47) | ||
|
Luo |
8.09 |
7.43 | |
|
(6.05) |
(6.02) | ||
|
Kamba |
5.62 |
5.86 | |
|
(6.35) |
(6.35) | ||
|
Dominant language |
-3.06 |
-1.75 | |
|
(6.87) |
(6.81) | ||
|
ln Income before group |
-1.26** | ||
|
(.46) | |||
|
Constant |
96.06** 94.90** |
91.29** |
87.69** |
|
(14.77) (15.05) |
(15.39) |
(15.44) | |
|
No. obs. |
^^299 299- |
299 |
-296 |
|
Adj. R2_________________ |
.60 .60 |
.60 |
.61 |
Notes: Table reports estimated OLS coe‰ients. Robust standard errors in parenthesis.
* denotes significance at the 10 percent level, ** at the 5 percent level.
All regressions include GROUP fixed effects.
25
More intriguing information
1. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals2. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
3. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
4. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. From music student to professional: the process of transition
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs