Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005



Electronic Data Delivery System of The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. In econometric applications
below, we use the real variables which we obtain by deflating our variables by the GNP deflator. Our data is given
in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Income Tax Revenue and Taxable Income: 1975-2005, in million YTL

years

Income Tax Revenue ( T )

Nominal GNP ( Y )______

Taxable Income(TI)

1975

43.50______________________

690.9008________________

647.3917____________

1976

59.30______________________

868.0658________________

805.9202____________

1977

87.70______________________

1108.2707_______________

1031.7467___________

1978

139.40_____________________

1645.9685_______________

1527.1844___________

1979

233.10____________________

2876.5229_______________

2690.0576___________

1980

463.80____________________

5303.0102_______________

4965.6312___________

1981

745.80____________________

8022.7453_______________

7442.9227___________

1982

804.90____________________

10611.8592______________

9886.9590___________

1983

1109.87____________________

13933.0081______________

12843.8519__________

1984

1341.00____________________

22167.7399_____________

20785.9830_________

1985

1771.76____________________

35350.3184_____________

32384.8482__________

1986

3052.87___________________

51184.7593______________

46316.3705__________

1987

4424.40___________________

75019.3880_____________

67945.9444_________

1988

6918.50___________________

129175.1037_____________

118219.1656_________

1989

13468.50__________________

230369.9371_____________

211369.0890________

1990

23245.90__________________

397177.5474____________

365731.4159________

1991

40419.50__________________

634392.8411_____________

583794.7753_________

1992

70133.70__________________

1103604.9090____________

1009425.5400________

1993

125793.00________________

1997322.5974____________

1848801.7668________

1994

246578.60________________

3887902.9165___________

3633779.7261________

1995

436000.00________________

7854887.1670___________

7337185.5632_______

1996

865909.00________________

14978067.2830__________

14090439.2427

1997

1897693.00_______________

29393262.1470__________

26601657.9519

1998

4231794.70_______________

53518331.5800__________

50873904.4317

1999

6537502.00_______________

78282966.8090__________

73941964.6117

2000

10503414.60______________

125596128.7550_________

119662278.5856

2001

15647885.00______________

176483953.0210_________

176446798.1920

2002

19343401.00______________

275032365.9528_________

262196553.8044

2003

25716174.00_____________

356680888.2222_________

324693990.8191

2004

29307924.00_____________

428932343.0257_________

374787394.4870

2005

34219410.00_____________

480922786.9____________

404019328.9________

Source: SPO and CB of Turkey

A time series is said to be nonstationary if its mean and variance are not constant over time and the value of the
covariance between two time periods depend on the actual time at which the covariance is computed. Regressions
involving nonstationary time series data include the possibility of obtaining spurious regressions. The results of
such regressions seem artificially good but they do not reflect the true relation. So the stationarity of a time series
must be tested by a unit root test. In our study, we use Augmented Dickey Fuller Unit Root test (ADF) and KPSS
unit root test (Kwiatkowski, Phillips, Schmidt, Shin, 1992), to test the time-series properties of our variables.

ADF unit root test sets the null hypothesis that the series has a unit root (not stationary). In other words, this test
use unit autoregressive (AR) roots as null hypothesis. But KPSS unit root test sets stationarity as the null
hypothesis. The asymptotic distributions of two tests are different. It is much more confident that if two tests’



More intriguing information

1. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
2. The name is absent
3. Job quality and labour market performance
4. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
5. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
6. The name is absent
7. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
8. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
9. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
17. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
18. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
19. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
20. The name is absent