36
Michael Fertig and Christoph M. Schmidt
Table 5
Summary Statistics of Variables
Variable |
Complete sample |
Restricted sample-Men | ||
mean |
standard- |
mean |
standard- | |
Dependent variable | ||||
Employed |
0.629 |
0.483 |
0.744 |
0.436 |
Individual characteristics | ||||
Age in age group below 30 |
6.580 |
10.623 |
6.645 |
10.652 |
Age squared in age group below 30 |
156.147 |
264.464 |
157.611 |
265.186 |
Age in age group 30-55 |
23.950 |
21.571 |
23.870 |
21.558 |
Age squared in age group 30-55 |
1038.878 |
1020.957 |
1034.535 |
1019.714 |
Age in age group above 55 |
8.749 |
21.188 |
8.644 |
21.076 |
Age squared in age group above 55 |
525.451 |
1276.645 |
518.931 |
1269.245 |
Female |
0.511 |
0.500 |
- |
- |
Medium education |
0.318 |
0.466 |
0.320 |
0.467 |
Low Education |
0.474 |
0.499 |
0.472 |
0.499 |
Disability |
0.199 |
0.399 |
0.190 |
0.392 |
Variables measuring demographic change | ||||
Relative own cohort size |
6.878 |
1.027 |
6.886 |
1.027 |
Relative own cohort size squared |
48.359 |
13.852 |
48.477 |
13.875 |
Share of highly educated in cohort |
20.97 |
16.70 |
20.86 |
16.51 |
Country indicators | ||||
UK |
0.072 |
0.258 |
0.068 |
0.252 |
Germany |
0.098 |
0.297 |
0.098 |
0.298 |
Denmark |
0.034 |
0.181 |
0.034 |
0.181 |
The Netherlands |
0.075 |
0.264 |
0.073 |
0.260 |
Belgium |
0.040 |
0.196 |
0.039 |
0.193 |
France |
0.085 |
0.279 |
0.085 |
0.279 |
Ireland |
0.045 |
0.207 |
0.046 |
0.210 |
Italy |
0.128 |
0.335 |
0.130 |
0.337 |
Greece |
0.072 |
0.258 |
0.071 |
0.257 |
Spain |
0.104 |
0.305 |
0.105 |
0.306 |
Portugal |
0.087 |
0.282 |
0.087 |
0.282 |
Austria |
0.050 |
0.219 |
0.051 |
0.220 |
Finland |
0.063 |
0.242 |
0.064 |
0.244 |
Sweden |
0.047 |
0.212 |
0.048 |
0.215 |
Number of observations |
98,568 |
48,172 | ||
RWI | ||||
ESSEN |
More intriguing information
1. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES2. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
3. The name is absent
4. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
5. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
6. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
7. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
8. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
9. The name is absent
10. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics