|
Table 2: |
Estimation Results of Logit Models | |||
|
CLogit |
RP. Logit | |||
|
×10-2 |
CLogit |
RP. Logit |
with EC. |
with EC. |
|
Cost (Cij) |
-12.667** |
-12.873** |
-18.469** |
-18.410** |
|
Energy Savings (∆Qij) |
22.700** |
23.296** |
32.806** |
32.843** |
|
Interaction of Cost with | ||||
|
Energy Consumption |
0.101 ** |
0.102** |
0.157** |
0.157** |
|
Income |
-0.124* |
-0.129* |
-0.177** |
-0.182** |
|
Information Access |
0.116 |
0.121 |
0.157* |
0.157* |
|
East |
4.783** |
4.946** |
7.723** |
7.724** |
|
Interaction of Energy Savings with | ||||
|
Energy Consumption |
-0.162** |
-0.167** |
-0.239** |
-0.241** |
|
Income |
0.100 |
0.105 |
0.152* |
0.158* |
|
Information Access |
-0.020 |
-0.022 |
-0.020 |
-0.020 |
|
East |
-0.980 |
-1.073 |
-2.817 |
-2.770 |
|
Standard deviation for random parameters distribution | ||||
|
Cost |
4.732 |
0.110 | ||
|
Energy Savings |
1.289 |
0.318 | ||
|
Standard deviation for error components | ||||
|
No renovation |
0.365 |
0.501 | ||
|
Annoying renovation |
210.741** |
211.819** | ||
|
Log-Likelihood |
-5054 |
-5054 |
-5035 |
-5034 |
|
**significant at the 1% level, |
* significant at the 5% level. Alternative specific constants not presented. | |||
3 Results
In this section we present the results of the discrete choice models. The section
begins with a cataloging of the coefficient estimates followed by a comparison of
model fit. Thereafter we derive the marginal WTP and present its distribution
over households. The section closes with a discussion of free-ridership and policy
implications.
3.1 Coefficient Estimates and Model Fit
Table 2 presents the results of a conditional-, random parameters-, error com-
ponents, and error components with random parameters logit model. All four
models tell a consistent story. The signs of the significant coefficients are the
15
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Imitation in location choice
3. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
4. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
10. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION