|
Table 19 |
CGE estimated net GDP effect of preferential and unilateral tariff liberalization and NTB | ||||||||
|
liberalization |
(billions of US dollars, equivalent variation |
measure) | |||||||
|
Reversion of preferentials |
Reversion of nontariff barrier rates |
Reversion to 1990 tariffs | |||||||
|
Terms of |
Overall |
Terms of |
Overall |
Terms of |
Overall | ||||
|
Country/region Efficiency |
trade |
effect |
Efficiency |
trade |
effect |
Efficiency |
trade |
effect | |
|
Australia |
-0.2 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
-3.1 |
-0.2 |
-3.3 |
-1.9 |
0.2 |
-1.7 |
|
Brazil |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
-6.3 |
0.4 |
-6.0 |
-4.3 |
1.4 |
-3.0 |
|
Canada |
-1.8 |
-1.3 |
-3.1 |
-4.5 |
-4.1 |
-8.6 |
-2.9 |
-0.1 |
-3.0 |
|
China |
0.3 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
-14.5 |
-0.2 |
-14.7 |
-38.2 |
28.3 |
-9.9 |
|
EU-15 |
1.6 |
4.7 |
6.3 |
-84.0 |
1.1 |
-82.9 |
-29.2 |
1.2 |
-28.0 |
|
Hong Kong |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-1.6 |
-1.9 |
-0.0 |
-3.2 |
-3.3 |
|
India |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
-4.7 |
1.2 |
-3.5 |
-13.9 |
10.2 |
-3.6 |
|
Indonesia |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
-1.7 |
-0.6 |
-2.3 |
-1.5 |
0.4 |
-1.2 |
|
Japan |
0.3 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
-16.4 |
1.9 |
-14.5 |
-2.0 |
-1.9 |
-3.9 |
|
Korea |
0.1 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
-6.5 |
-0.0 |
-6.5 |
-3.1 |
1.4 |
-1.7 |
|
Malaysia |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
-7.7 |
-5.1 |
-12.8 |
-0.6 |
-3.9 |
-4.5 |
|
Mexico |
-3.5 |
-1.5 |
-5.0 |
-14.0 |
0.6 |
-13.4 |
-8.1 |
0.9 |
-7.1 |
|
Philippines |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
-4.9 |
0.3 |
-4.6 |
-1.0 |
0.4 |
-0.7 |
|
Singapore |
-0.0 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.4 |
-1.8 |
-2.2 |
-0.2 |
-3.9 |
-4.1 |
|
Taiwan |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
-17.7 |
-0.4 |
-18.1 |
-0.9 |
-1.8 |
-2.7 |
|
Thailand |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
-0.7 |
-1.5 |
-2.2 |
-5.1 |
0.9 |
-4.2 |
|
Venezuela |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.6 |
-0.1 |
-0.3 |
-0.4 |
|
United States |
-1.8 |
-10.9 |
-12.7 |
-28.9 |
24.4 |
-4.5 |
-3.5 |
-5.0 |
-8.5 |
|
Rest of world |
0.7 |
2.4 |
3.1 |
-2.3 |
-14.1 |
-16.4 |
-4.8 |
-26.0 |
-30.8 |
|
Total |
-4.2 |
-218.9 |
-122.3 | ||||||
Notes: These results are interpreted in the same way as table 18. The model predicts big terms of trade swings for the larger economies in the NTB
simulations, but only for the United States are the favorable swings large enough to roughly balance the allocative efficiency losses. The reversion of
preferentials scenario entails elimination of the US trade agreements with Australia, Canada, Mexico, and Singapore.
Source: Gilbert (2009) calculations using GTAP7 database.
35
More intriguing information
1. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz2. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
3. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
4. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
5. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
6. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
7. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -