Table 17 Percentage change in the sectoral composition of US employment of skilled labor derived
from the CGE model
|
Sector |
Uruguay |
Tokyo Round |
Transportation |
Preferential |
Nontariff |
1990 tariff |
|
Paddy rice |
-2.5 |
-3.0 |
-7.0 |
0.8 |
-4.3 |
-2.1 |
|
Wheat |
-2.4 |
-2.3 |
-10.0 |
1.0 |
-6.0 |
-2.2 |
|
Other cereal grains |
-2.3 |
-2.5 |
-1.9 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
-2.1 |
|
Vegetables, fruit, nuts |
-0.8 |
-0.7 |
-0.4 |
0.5 |
3.6 |
-0.7 |
|
Oil seeds |
-2.4 |
-2.2 |
-4.1 |
0.3 |
-4.1 |
-3.0 |
|
Sugar cane, beet |
0.2 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
0.3 |
|
Plant-based fibers |
-2.8 |
-3.3 |
-2.7 |
-0.0 |
-1.5 |
-1.0 |
|
Other crops |
0.2 |
-0.3 |
-0.9 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
-0.1 |
|
Cattle, sheep & goats, |
-0.6 |
-0.4 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
3.9 |
-1.0 |
|
Other animal products |
-1.2 |
-1.4 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.6 |
-1.7 |
|
Raw milk |
-2.5 |
-2.6 |
-0.1 |
-0.8 |
1.3 |
-2.6 |
|
Wool, silkworm cocoons |
-1.3 |
-1.1 |
-3.9 |
2.9 |
-8.6 |
-0.7 |
|
Forestry |
-0.6 |
-0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
-0.2 |
|
Fishing |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
0.1 |
1.1 |
-0.1 |
|
Coal |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
-0.8 |
0.2 |
-0.9 |
-0.4 |
|
Oil |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
-1.5 |
-0.6 |
|
Gas |
-1.0 |
-1.6 |
-1.2 |
0.1 |
16.5 |
-1.1 |
|
Other minerals |
-0.4 |
-0.3 |
0.2 |
-0.2 |
-1.5 |
-0.3 |
|
Cattle, sheep & goat meat |
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
2.9 |
-0.6 |
|
Other meat products |
-1.2 |
-1.3 |
0.3 |
-0.4 |
-0.5 |
-1.7 |
|
Vegetable oils & fats |
-2.3 |
-2.5 |
1.7 |
-1.2 |
-1.3 |
-1.0 |
|
Dairy products |
-2.6 |
-2.7 |
0.0 |
-0.9 |
1.3 |
-2.6 |
|
Processed rice |
-2.2 |
-2.0 |
-2.8 |
1.0 |
-2.2 |
-2.1 |
|
Sugar |
0.2 |
0.2 |
-0.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
0.3 |
|
Other food products |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
0.2 |
-0.2 |
1.0 |
-0.1 |
|
Beverages & tobacco |
0.1 |
-0.5 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.5 |
|
Textiles |
-1.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
-1.2 |
5.2 |
1.0 |
|
Wearing apparel |
1.3 |
3.9 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
14.6 |
4.1 |
|
Leather products |
-3.4 |
-3.8 |
-1.0 |
-3.7 |
-1.0 |
-2.6 |
|
Wood products |
-0.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
3.8 |
0.7 |
|
Paper products, publishing |
-0.7 |
-1.0 |
-0.0 |
-0.3 |
-1.2 |
-0.9 |
|
Petroleum, coal products |
-0.6 |
-0.7 |
-1.3 |
-0.4 |
-1.5 |
0.2 |
|
Chemical, rubber, plastics |
-0.6 |
-0.7 |
-0.4 |
-0.5 |
-1.9 |
-0.1 |
|
Nonmetallic minerals |
0.1 |
0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
-1.2 |
-0.2 |
|
Ferrous metals |
-0.1 |
1.5 |
3.1 |
-0.6 |
-1.7 |
1.0 |
|
Other metals |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
-0.3 |
-4.0 |
0.3 |
|
Metal products |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
1.0 |
-1.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
|
Motor vehicles & parts |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
-1.5 |
4.2 |
-0.6 |
|
Other transport equipment |
1.5 |
-0.5 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
-1.5 |
|
Electronic equipment |
3.9 |
5.7 |
-0.1 |
-0.0 |
1.1 |
7.6 |
|
Other machinery & equip- |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
-0.2 |
0.1 |
|
Other manufactures |
0.8 |
2.0 |
-1.8 |
0.5 |
-1.5 |
2.0 |
|
Services |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.0 |
-0.0 |
Source: Gilbert (2009) calculations using GTAP7 database.
More intriguing information
1. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement2. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
3. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
4. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
5. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
6. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
7. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
8. The name is absent
9. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
10. Perfect Regular Equilibrium