Table A.25 European Union: Post-Tokyo Round and post-Uruguay Round bound rates, GTAP
sectors (percent)
Bound rates with proxy ad valorem equivalents
of specific bound rates
Simple average of ad |
Tokyo |
Tokyo used |
Uruguay |
Uruguay | ||||
GTAP |
HS6 |
(Used = |
higher of MFN |
(Used = higher of MFN | ||||
code |
GTAP sector |
lines |
Tokyo |
Uruguay |
applied, Uruguay, Tokyo) |
applied, Uruguay) | ||
1 |
Paddy rice |
2 |
12.0 |
7.7 |
12.0 |
80.4 |
52.8 |
80.4 |
2 |
Wheat |
2 |
20.0 |
12.8 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
8.9 |
13.2 |
3 |
Cereal grains, other |
10 |
7.0 |
3.2 |
4.7 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
4 |
Vegetables, fruit, nuts |
85 |
9.8 |
7.1 |
10.1 |
10.4 |
9.7 |
10.4 |
5 |
Oil seeds |
16 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6 |
Sugar cane, sugar beet |
2 |
ND |
ND |
0.0 |
179.9 |
179.9 |
179.9 |
7 |
Plant-based fibers |
8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
8 |
Crops, other |
64 |
7.2 |
3.1 |
7.3 |
9.2 |
2.9 |
7.8 |
9 |
Bovine cattle, sheep and goats |
8 |
5.1 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
18.8 |
18.8 |
18.8 |
10 |
Animal products, other |
46 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
2.1 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
12 |
Wool, silkworm cocoons |
6 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
13 |
Forestry |
28 |
1.2 |
0.4 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
14 |
Fishing |
41 |
10.8 |
9.1 |
10.8 |
10.8 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
15 |
Coal |
6 |
ND |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
16 |
Oil |
2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
17 |
Gas |
2 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
18 |
Minerals, other |
96 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
19 |
Bovine meat products |
30 |
12.8 |
7.6 |
13.4 |
49.4 |
49.4 |
49.4 |
20 |
Meat products, other |
38 |
12.1 |
7.1 |
12.6 |
18.8 |
18.0 |
18.8 |
21 |
Vegetable oils and fats |
46 |
7.3 |
4.5 |
7.5 |
12.7 |
12.7 |
12.7 |
22 |
Dairy products |
21 |
11.5 |
7.4 |
12.0 |
125.4 |
125.4 |
125.4 |
23 |
Processed rice |
2 |
ND |
ND |
101.0 |
101.0 |
42.2 |
42.5 |
24 |
Sugar containing products |
7 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
10.0 |
46.0 |
46.0 |
46.0 |
25 |
Food products, other |
245 |
14.8 |
11.3 |
15.8 |
21.0 |
19.8 |
21.0 |
26 |
Beverages and tobacco products |
29 |
36.6 |
20.8 |
38.1 |
38.3 |
24.9 |
24.9 |
27 |
Textiles |
569 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
9.8 |
1.5 |
7.0 |
28 |
Wearing apparel |
241 |
5.0 |
2.5 |
5.1 |
12.2 |
2.6 |
10.8 |
29 |
Leather products |
68 |
6.0 |
4.6 |
7.7 |
8.2 |
5.9 |
6.4 |
30 |
Wood products |
89 |
5.8 |
2.2 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
31 |
Paper products |
151 |
7.2 |
3.5 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
32 |
Petroleum, coal products |
15 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
33 |
Chemical, rubber, plastic products |
959 |
7.1 |
4.5 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
34 |
Mineral products, other |
161 |
5.5 |
3.3 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
35 |
Ferrous metals |
167 |
5.3 |
0.5 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
0.6 |
3.7 |
36 |
Metals, other |
168 |
4.4 |
2.8 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
37 |
Metal products |
215 |
5.3 |
2.8 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
38 |
Motor vehicles and parts |
54 |
8.3 |
6.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
6.3 |
6.4 |
39 |
Transport equipment, other |
82 |
4.5 |
2.4 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
40 |
Electronic equipment |
119 |
6.8 |
3.9 |
6.6 |
7.0 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
41 |
Machinery and equipment, other |
853 |
4.6 |
2.1 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
42 |
Manufactures, other |
178 |
5.6 |
2.7 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
ND = no data
Notes: Ad valorem bound rates are directly from WTO/GATT schedules. Where specific rates exist, the average of applied tariff ad valorem equivalents
from 1988, 1990, and 1991 was spliced into the Tokyo schedule (1990-92 for GTAP 6, 1995-97 for GTAP 23), and from 2002, 2003, and 2005 into the
Uruguay schedule.
Sources: WTO (2008); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008).
71
More intriguing information
1. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA2. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
6. The name is absent
7. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
8. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
9. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
10. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent