NURSES’ RETENTION AND HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS IN NEW SOUTH WALES
Table 4. Results of probit estimation of RN retention probabilities*
|
VARIABLE |
COEF. |
P-VALUE |
COEF. |
P-VALUE |
|
constant |
-2.937 |
0.000 |
-2.553 |
0.000 |
|
PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS | ||||
|
male |
-0.191 |
0.000 |
-0.182 |
0.000 |
|
age |
0.164 |
0.000 |
0.157 |
0.000 |
|
age squared |
-0.002 |
0.000 |
-0.002 |
0.000 |
|
foreign born |
0.037 |
0.340 |
0.061 |
0.126 |
|
UK born |
-0.122 |
0.008 |
-0.110 |
0.018 |
|
NZ born |
-0.039 |
0.667 |
-0.028 |
0.752 |
|
foreign citizen |
-0.090 |
0.089 |
-0.088 |
0.099 |
|
not permanent resident |
-0.564 |
0.209 |
-0.590 |
0.216 |
|
WORK CHARACTERISTICS | ||||
|
work hours |
0.006 |
0.022 |
0.006 |
0.013 |
|
work hours squared (00s) |
-0.005 |
0.084 |
-0.005 |
0.055 |
|
post basic qualifications |
0.045 |
0.076 |
0.048 |
0.060 |
|
years registered |
0.022 |
0.000 |
0.021 |
0.000 |
|
years registered squared(0s) |
-0.005 |
0.002 |
-0.005 |
0.004 |
|
unemployment rate |
0.012 |
0.001 |
0.004 |
0.391 |
|
activity surgical |
0.057 |
0.047 |
0.054 |
0.064 |
|
activity psych |
0.011 |
0.762 |
-0.001 |
0.989 |
|
job clinical |
0.095 |
0.001 |
0.103 |
0.000 |
|
job managerial |
-0.049 |
0.434 |
-0.037 |
0.548 |
|
HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS | ||||
|
acute separations (excl babies) |
0.008 |
0.096 | ||
|
non acute separations (excl babies) |
0.027 |
0.195 | ||
|
baby separations |
-0.077 |
0.076 | ||
|
separations (excl babies)/nurse |
-0.004 |
0.065 | ||
|
baby separations/nurse |
0.027 |
0.097 | ||
|
emergency admissions/nurse |
0.009 |
0.004 | ||
|
bed days |
-0.003 |
0.042 | ||
|
%non acute bed days |
-0.002 |
0.052 | ||
|
ANDRG wt |
-0.232 |
0.020 | ||
|
high cost procedures/nurse |
-0.555 |
0.003 | ||
|
cost per non acute bed day |
1.781 |
0.027 | ||
|
wait time |
0.052 |
0.060 | ||
|
length of stay |
0.000 |
0.472 | ||
|
non VMO expenditure |
0.069 |
0.001 | ||
|
nurse EFT |
-0.180 |
0.631 | ||
|
non nurse clinical EFT |
-0.586 |
0.001 | ||
|
non clinical EFT |
-0.240 |
0.078 | ||
|
VMO expenditure |
-0.300 |
0.045 | ||
|
sample size |
16393 |
16393 | ||
|
pseudo R2 |
0.048 |
0.052 | ||
|
Log likelihood value |
-7700.739 |
-7669.826 | ||
|
observed probability |
0.805 |
0.805 | ||
|
mean predicted probability |
0.805 |
0.805 | ||
|
probability predicted at means |
0.815 |
0.816 | ||
|
proportion correctly predicted:** | ||||
|
not working in 1997 |
0.545 |
0.561 | ||
|
working in 1997 |
0.685 |
0.679 |
More intriguing information
1. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES2. The name is absent
3. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
4. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
5. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
6. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
7. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
8. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
9. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland
10. The name is absent