Appendix 3: Summary of the studies found in the literature review | ||||||||
Study |
Comparison |
Patient |
Incremental |
Measure of |
Method |
Effectiveness |
Cost (per |
Incremental cost |
NICE guidelines |
a) Patients go straight to b) Patients have a |
Potential |
Cost Utility |
Quality adjusted |
Decision |
a) 2.846 |
a) 6317.39 b) 7519.71 c) 6581.87 |
c) vs a) b) dominated by |
NICE guidelines |
a) Patients go straight to |
Patients |
Cost Utility |
Quality adjusted |
Decision |
b) vs a ) 4.3 |
b) vs a) |
b) vs a) |
31
More intriguing information
1. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power2. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
3. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
4. The name is absent
5. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
9. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology
10. The name is absent