|
Scott 1998, USA |
a) CT - if positive then b) PET after negative CT PET or +ve CT ) c) PET and CT d) PET and CT |
Potentially |
Cost |
LY gained |
Decision |
b) vs a) 0.007 c) vs a) 0.009 d) vs a) 0.007 |
b) vs a) $177 |
b) vs a) $25,286/ c) vs a) $70,889/ d) vs a) $37,857/ |
|
Verboom et al |
a) Conventional work up b) CWU + 18 FDG- PET |
Medically |
Cost |
Number of futile |
Randomised |
a) 39 futile b) 19 futile |
a) € 9,573 b) € 8284 |
CWU + PET |
|
Viney et al |
a) CT scan (Thorax, upper b) CT scan + PET |
Patients |
Cost |
Number of futile |
Randomised |
b) vs a) 0.22 |
b vs a) $A |
b) vs a) $120,681/ |
|
Kosuda et al |
a) Whole body (WB) PET |
Potentially |
Cost |
Life expectancy |
Decision |
b) vs a) gain in |
b) vs a) cost |
n/a |
34
More intriguing information
1. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Who runs the IFIs?
6. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
7. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
8. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
9. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
10. The name is absent