Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6



Herder, G. J., H. Kramer, et al. (2006). "Traditional versus up-front [18F]
fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer:
a Dutch cooperative randomized study."
J Clin Oncol 24(12): 1800-6.

HTBS, “Comment on NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance on the use of docetaxel,
paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
2001B.

Hunink, M et al, Decision making in Health and Medicine: Integrating evidence and
values, Cambrdige, C.U.P, 2001.

Keith, C. J., K. A. Miles, et al. (2002). "Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-
effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data."
Eur J Nucl Med Mol
Imaging
29(8): 1016-23.

Kelly, R. F., T. Tran, et al. (2004). "Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of [18F]-2-fluoro-
deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in potentially resectable non-small
cell lung cancer."
Chest 125(4): 1413-23.

Kosuda, S., K. Ichihara, et al. (2002). "Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-
effectiveness of whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with non-small-cell
lung carcinoma in Japan."
Ann Nucl Med 16(4): 263-71.

Miles, K. A. (2001). "An approach to demonstrating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic
imaging modalities in Australia illustrated by positron emission tomography."
Australas
Radiol
45(1): 9-18.

National Institute of Health and Clinical Effectiveness, “The Diagnosis and treatment of
Lung Cancer; Methods, Evidence and Guidance.
National Collaboration Centre of Acute
Care.
2005.

Nguyen, V. H., S. Peloquin, et al. (2005). "Cost-effectiveness of positron emission
tomography for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer in
Quebec"
Canadian Respiratory Journal 12(1): 19-25.

Rosenthal, M. A., P. J. Webster, et al. (1992). "The cost of treating small cell lung
cancer."
Med J Aust 156(9): 605-10.

Scott, W. J., J. Shepherd, et al. (1998). "Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-
small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis."
Ann Thorac Surg 66(6): 1876-83; discussion
1883-5.

Sloka, J. S., P. D. Hollett, et al. (2004). "Cost-effectiveness of positron emission
tomography for non-small cell lung carcinoma in Canada."
Med Sci Monit 10(5): MT73-
80.

van Tinteren, H., O. S. Hoekstra, et al. (2002). "Effectiveness of positron emission
tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung
cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial."
Lancet 359(9315): 1388-93.



More intriguing information

1. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
2. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
3. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
4. The name is absent
5. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
6. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
7. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
8. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
9. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
10. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
11. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
12. The name is absent
13. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
14. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
15. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
16. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
17. The name is absent
18. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
19. EU enlargement and environmental policy
20. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models