The name is absent



Van Gool & Bridges


Hall et al (1988) estimated their results as follows:

TABLE 1: HALL ET AL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES

INTERVENTION

TARGET

NUMBER OF

MEN

CASES
PREVENTED

One

Whole pop

60 000

264(10%)

Two

Target group

9 000

169(20%)

Remaining pop

51 000

0

Three

Target pop

9 000

169 (20%)

Remaining pop

51 000

179(10%)

Four

Target pop

12 000

135 (15%)

Remaining pop

48 000

0

Five

Target pop

9 600

317(30%)

Remaining pop

50 400

_____________0_

The cost information from the Hall et al study is as follows:

TABLE 2: HALL ET AL

- COSTS, SAVINGS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIO

INTERVENTION

TOTAL SAVING

COST PER

NET COST

COST     (AUS)

CASE

PER CASE

(AUS)

PREVENTED

PREVENTED

(AUS)

(AUS)

One

331,000    1,250,000

1,254

(3,481)*

Two

5,455,000     800,000

32,278

27,544

Three

6,092,000    1,647,000

17,506

12,773

Four

4,284,000     639,000

31,733

27,000

Five

6,459,000    1,501,000

__________20,375

_________15,640

(* indicates net saving.)

This paper will closely follow the approach taken by Hall et al.

13


Chere Project Report 11- November 1999



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
3. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
4. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
5. The name is absent
6. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
7. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
8. Staying on the Dole
9. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
10. sycnoιogιcaι spaces