Table 4: Main Respondent Income Non-Response in Sweeps One and Two
_____________Sweep One_____________ |
______________Sweep Two______________ | |||||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) | |
Interviewer was male________ |
1.2 |
1.3 | ||||
(0.73 - 1.9) |
(0.80 - 2.2) | |||||
Main self employed__________ |
6.3 |
6.4 |
6.8 |
6.6 |
6.7 | |
(3.7 - 11)** |
(3.8 - 11)** |
(4.6 - 10)** |
(4.4 - 9.8)** |
(4.5 - 9.9)** | ||
Main’s age at interview_______ |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 | |
(0.98 - 1.0) |
(0.98 - 1.0) |
(1.0 - 1.0) |
(0.98 - 1.0) |
(0.98 - 1.0) | ||
Main has a partner__________ |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.58 |
0.57 |
0.56 | |
(0.66 - 1.5) |
(0.67 - 1.6) |
(0.43-0.77)** |
(0.42 - 0.76)** |
(0.42 - 0.76)** | ||
Social Class of Main Respondent: reference | ||||||
Intermediate_________________ |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 | |
(1.0 - 2.3)* |
(1.1 - 2.3)* |
(0.80 - 1.5) |
(0.78 - 1.5) |
(0.79 - 1.5) | ||
Small employers and self |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.0 | |
(1.1 - 3.1)* |
(1.1 - 3.0)* |
(0.86 - 2.0) |
(0.68 - 1.6) |
(0.66 - 1.5) | ||
Lower supervisors and |
0.85 |
0.86 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 | |
(0.44 - 1.7) |
(0.44 - 1.7) |
(0.55 - 2.2) |
(0.57 - 2.2) |
(0.59 - 2.3) | ||
Semi routine and routine |
1.4 |
1.4 |
0.93 |
0.95 |
0.96 | |
(0.90 - 2.0) |
(0.90 - 2.0) |
(0.61 - 1.4) |
(0.62 - 1.5) |
(0.62 - 1.5) | ||
NVQ Levels: reference | ||||||
NVQ Level 1_______________ |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.4 | |
(0.61 - 2.5) |
(0.61 - 2.6) |
(0.56 - 3.8) |
(0.54 - 3.8) |
(0.54 - 3.7) | ||
NVQ Level 2 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
0.77 |
0.76 | |
(0.50 - 1.4) |
(0.50 - 1.4) |
(0.34 - 1.7) |
(0.34 - 1.8) |
(0.34 - 1.7) | ||
NVQ Level 3 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 | |
(0.40 - 1.3) |
(0.40 - 1.3) |
(0.44 - 2.7) |
(0.45 - 2.7) |
(0.44 - 2.6) | ||
NVQ Level 4 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
0.87 |
0.85 | |
(0.51 - 1.5) |
(0.51 - 1.5) |
(0.35 - 2.0) |
(0.36 - 2.1) |
(0.35 - 2.0) | ||
NVQ Level 5 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 | |
(0.64 - 2.3) |
(0.64 - 2.3) |
(0.41 - 2.9) |
(0.40 - 2.9) |
(0.39 - 2.9) |
11
11
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
4. The name is absent
5. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
6. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
7. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
8. The name is absent
9. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
10. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES