Table 5: Partner Respondent Income Non-Response in Sweeps One and Two
|
_____________Sweep One_____________ |
_____________Sweep Two_____________ | |||||
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) | |
|
Interviewer was male________ |
1.2 |
1.3 | ||||
|
(0.75 - 1.9) |
(0.79 - 2.1) | |||||
|
Partner self employed_______ |
1.7 |
1.7 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 | |
|
(1.3 - 2.3)** |
(1.3 - 2.3)** |
(2.7 - 4.8)** |
(2.7 - 4.9)** |
(2.7 - 4.9)** | ||
|
Partner’s age at interview |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 | |
|
(1.0 - 1.0)** |
(1.0 - 1.0)** |
(1.0 - 1.0)* |
(1.0 - 1.0) |
(1.0 - 1.0) | ||
|
Social Class of Partner Respondent: reference | ||||||
|
Intermediate_________________ |
0.84 |
0.83 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
0.92 | |
|
(0.44 - 1.6) |
(0.43 - 1.6) |
(0.55 - 1.4) |
(0.58 - 1.4) |
(0.59 - 1.5) | ||
|
Small employers and self |
3.0 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.1 | |
|
(2.3 - 3.9)** |
(2.3 - 3.9)** |
(0.90 - 1.8) |
(0.77 - 1.6) |
(0.78 - 1.6) | ||
|
Lower supervisors and |
0.68 |
0.68 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 | |
|
(0.47 - 0.98)* |
(0.47 - 0.97)* |
(0.81 - 1.4) |
(0.84 - 1.4) |
(0.83 - 1.4) | ||
|
Semi routine and routine |
0.67 |
0.66 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
0.91 | |
|
(0.49 - 0.91)* |
(0.48 - 0.89)** |
(0.69 - 1.1) |
(0.71 - 1.2) |
(0.71 - 1.2) | ||
|
NVQ Levels: reference | ||||||
|
NVQ Level 1_______________ |
0.77 |
0.77 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 | |
|
(0.47 - 1.2) |
(0.47 - 1.2) |
(0.69 - 1.7) |
(0.68 - 1.6) |
(0.66 - 1.6) | ||
|
NVQ Level 2 |
0.63 |
0.63 |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.83 | |
|
(0.44 - 0.90)* |
(0.44 - 0.91)* |
(0.54 - 1.1) |
(0.58 - 1.2) |
(0.58 - 1.2) | ||
|
NVQ Level 3 |
0.59 |
0.59 |
0.78 |
0.82 |
0.82 | |
|
(0.39 - 0.88)* |
(0.39 - 0.88)* |
(0.52 - 1.2) |
(0.55 - 1.2) |
(0.55 - 1.2) | ||
|
NVQ Level 4 |
0.47 |
0.47 |
0.69 |
0.75 |
0.76 | |
|
(0.32 - 0.68)** |
(0.32 - 0.68)** |
(0.46 - 1.0) |
(0.51 - 1.1) |
(0.51 - 1.1) | ||
|
NVQ Level 5 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.73 |
0.81 |
0.82 | |
|
(0.19 - 0.60)** |
(0.19 - 0.59)** |
(0.45 - 1.2) |
(0.50 - 1.3) |
(0.51 - 1.3) | ||
|
Other/overseas quals only |
0.57 |
0.57 |
0.89 |
0.96 |
0.92 | |
|
(0.32 - 1.0) |
(0.32 - 1.0) |
(0.50 - 1.6) |
(0.53 - 1.7) |
(0.51 - 1.7) | ||
13
13
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
3. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography
4. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
5. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
6. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
7. The name is absent
8. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
9. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
10. The name is absent