Appendix 2.2: PG, MPHr KW annual assessments of the UK box office
SUBJECT |
_________CATEGORY___________ |
/16 |
YEARS | |
B |
Technology |
Best 3-D_____________________ |
2 |
53-54 |
B |
Technology |
Biggest cinemascope |
4 |
54-57 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best series * |
2 |
59-60 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best straight X-Certificate |
2 |
59-60 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best offbeat |
1 |
59 |
B |
Other Classificat |
Best gimmick |
1 |
59 |
B |
Other Classificat |
Best two reeler∕Best one |
2 |
46-47 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Best individual performance |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most promising newcomers |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most successful comedy team |
7 |
45, |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
3 |
45, |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular British star |
1 |
45 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular comedian |
1 |
59 |
* these categories are given twice in this table since they fall
into different classifications in this schema.
108
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
3. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
4. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
8. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
9. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
10. Großhandel: Steigende Umsätze und schwungvolle Investitionsdynamik