Appendix 2.2: PG, MPHr KW annual assessments of the UK box office
SUBJECT |
_________CATEGORY___________ |
/16 |
YEARS | |
B |
Technology |
Best 3-D_____________________ |
2 |
53-54 |
B |
Technology |
Biggest cinemascope |
4 |
54-57 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best series * |
2 |
59-60 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best straight X-Certificate |
2 |
59-60 |
B |
Other -ions |
Best offbeat |
1 |
59 |
B |
Other Classificat |
Best gimmick |
1 |
59 |
B |
Other Classificat |
Best two reeler∕Best one |
2 |
46-47 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Best individual performance |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most promising newcomers |
16 |
45-60 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most successful comedy team |
7 |
45, |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
3 |
45, |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular British star |
1 |
45 |
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular comedian |
1 |
59 |
* these categories are given twice in this table since they fall
into different classifications in this schema.
108
More intriguing information
1. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-19942. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
3. The name is absent
4. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
5. The name is absent
6. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
7. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization