Appendix 2.2: PG, MPHr KW annual assessments of the UK box office
|
SUBJECT |
_________CATEGORY___________ |
/16 |
YEARS | |
|
B |
Technology |
Best 3-D_____________________ |
2 |
53-54 |
|
B |
Technology |
Biggest cinemascope |
4 |
54-57 |
|
B |
Other -ions |
Best series * |
2 |
59-60 |
|
B |
Other -ions |
Best straight X-Certificate |
2 |
59-60 |
|
B |
Other -ions |
Best offbeat |
1 |
59 |
|
B |
Other Classificat |
Best gimmick |
1 |
59 |
|
B |
Other Classificat |
Best two reeler∕Best one |
2 |
46-47 |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Best individual performance |
16 |
45-60 |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
16 |
45-60 |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most promising newcomers |
16 |
45-60 |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most successful comedy team |
7 |
45, |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular and consistent |
3 |
45, |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular British star |
1 |
45 |
|
C |
Individual Stars |
Most popular comedian |
1 |
59 |
* these categories are given twice in this table since they fall
into different classifications in this schema.
108
More intriguing information
1. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies2. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
3. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
4. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
5. The name is absent
6. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
7. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games