TABLE I
Table I (A) shows the mean values (s) for latencies to approach and leave on pre- and postoperative training and test regimes after a
‘train-trill’ for birds with anterior (Al) and posterior lesions (Pl) and sham controls (C). Table I (B) shows the mean changes (with SD)
between regimes |
(A) Approach∕leave, mean latencies (s) |
Regime: Preoperative Postoperative |
‘Train’ ‘Test’ ‘Train’ ‘Test’ |
Group Approach Leave Approach Leave Approach Leave Approach Leave |
Al 2.5 q7 2.62 j? ≡i, S |
36.41 39.82 |
3.2 3.39 |
44.4 51.62 |
2.82 3.01 |
40.1 49.61 |
c 3∙8 40.52 2∙61 |
44.45 |
2.7 |
40.86 |
2.74 |
43.52 |
(B) Approach∕leave, change of latency (s) |
Regime: Group |
Approach |
Leave | ||
Pre- to postoperative |
Pre- to postoperative | |||
‘Train’ |
‘Test’ |
‘Train |
‘Test’ | |
Al |
+ 0.69a |
+ 0.39 |
+ 6.88 |
+ 3.65 |
± 0.9 |
± 0.7 |
± 7.1 |
± 4.8 | |
Pl |
+ 0.82a |
+ 0.27 |
+ 9.73c |
+ 9.6 |
± 0.6 |
± 0.2 |
± 11.8 |
+ 6.2 | |
C |
- 0.79b |
+ 0.13 |
+ 0.34d |
- 0.93 |
± 0.8 |
+ 0.1 |
+ 3.7 |
± 1.8 |
a>b,P< 0.01; c > d,P< 0.05.
More intriguing information
1. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
5. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
6. Long-Term Capital Movements
7. The name is absent
8. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent