TABLE II
Mean durations (with SD) of approach (s) to each of nine test stimuli, T1—T9, for birds with anterior (Al), posterior lesions (Pl) and
sham controls (C). The C group does not approach for as long as the two Iesioned groups following T2 (slow trill); The means are
also shown for the two homogeneous groups T1 T3, Ts, and T4, T,, T8, where the Pl group approaches for longer than the Al or C
groups
|
Stimuli T1 T3 T5 Group: |
T4 T7 T8 |
T2 T6 T9 | |||||||
|
Al |
17.7 |
12.5 |
13.8 |
9.3 |
7.7 |
11.5 |
21.5 |
19.4 |
7.9 |
|
± 13 |
± 8 |
± 20 |
± 11 |
± 8 |
± 12 |
± 17 |
± 22 |
± 19 | |
|
Pl |
33.9a |
30.4b |
25.4e |
27.6d |
18.3 |
22.5 |
22.3 |
21.8 |
2.2 |
|
± 19 |
± 19 |
± 15 |
± 16 |
± 16 |
± 18 |
± 21 |
± 14 |
± 6 | |
|
C |
10.0 |
11.0 |
6.0 |
10.0 |
0 |
5.0 |
3.3a |
20.0 |
0 |
|
± 13 |
± 11 |
± 10 |
± 9 |
± 0 |
± 8 |
± 5 |
± 20 |
± 0 | |
|
Mean Ti, T3, T5 |
Mean 1 |
Γ4, T-, Tt | |||||||
|
Al |
14.6 ± |
: 14 |
9.5 ± |
10 | |||||
|
Pl |
29.9 ι |
: 17b |
22.8 ± |
l7c | |||||
|
C |
9.0 і |
: 10 |
5.0 і |
7 | |||||
a = P < 0.05; b = P < 0.04; c - P < 0.03; d = P < 0.02; e = P < 0.05 with respect to preoperative levels; f = P < 0.001 Kendall
coefficient of concordance.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
4. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
5. The name is absent
6. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
7. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
8. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
9. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
10. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS