228 RElS AND ZAIDEL
variables in the ANOVA were Face Sex (women, men) and Face Side (left-left,
right-right, same). A significant main effect for face side emerged,
F(2,46) = 32.39, p <.00001, reflecting a lower mean for left-left than for
right-right. The main effect for Face Sex was not significant, F(l, 23) = 4.02, p
<.06. The two-way interaction, Face Sex × Face Side, was significant,
F(2,46) = 4.76,p<.01. Figure 1 shows the nature of this interaction.
In view of the significant interaction, analyses for simple effects were applied
to the data. A significant difference between left-left and right-right emerged
only for women’s faces, (t= —2.95; d.f. = 23; p=.007), with a nonsignificant
difference for men’s faces (f= — 1.79; d.f. = 23; p = 0.09). The mean forjudging
both faces “same” was low by comparison, in both women’s and men’s faces
(see Figure 1).

Figure 1. The mean percent preference for left-left, right-right, or same (i.e.. no difference) by
subjects viewing pairs of faces and deciding which one looks healthier.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
6. The name is absent
7. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
8. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
9. The name is absent
10. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS