228 RElS AND ZAIDEL
variables in the ANOVA were Face Sex (women, men) and Face Side (left-left,
right-right, same). A significant main effect for face side emerged,
F(2,46) = 32.39, p <.00001, reflecting a lower mean for left-left than for
right-right. The main effect for Face Sex was not significant, F(l, 23) = 4.02, p
<.06. The two-way interaction, Face Sex × Face Side, was significant,
F(2,46) = 4.76,p<.01. Figure 1 shows the nature of this interaction.
In view of the significant interaction, analyses for simple effects were applied
to the data. A significant difference between left-left and right-right emerged
only for women’s faces, (t= —2.95; d.f. = 23; p=.007), with a nonsignificant
difference for men’s faces (f= — 1.79; d.f. = 23; p = 0.09). The mean forjudging
both faces “same” was low by comparison, in both women’s and men’s faces
(see Figure 1).

Figure 1. The mean percent preference for left-left, right-right, or same (i.e.. no difference) by
subjects viewing pairs of faces and deciding which one looks healthier.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES
3. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
4. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
5. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
6. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY
7. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
8. The name is absent
9. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
10. Auction Design without Commitment