228 RElS AND ZAIDEL
variables in the ANOVA were Face Sex (women, men) and Face Side (left-left,
right-right, same). A significant main effect for face side emerged,
F(2,46) = 32.39, p <.00001, reflecting a lower mean for left-left than for
right-right. The main effect for Face Sex was not significant, F(l, 23) = 4.02, p
<.06. The two-way interaction, Face Sex × Face Side, was significant,
F(2,46) = 4.76,p<.01. Figure 1 shows the nature of this interaction.
In view of the significant interaction, analyses for simple effects were applied
to the data. A significant difference between left-left and right-right emerged
only for women’s faces, (t= —2.95; d.f. = 23; p=.007), with a nonsignificant
difference for men’s faces (f= — 1.79; d.f. = 23; p = 0.09). The mean forjudging
both faces “same” was low by comparison, in both women’s and men’s faces
(see Figure 1).
Figure 1. The mean percent preference for left-left, right-right, or same (i.e.. no difference) by
subjects viewing pairs of faces and deciding which one looks healthier.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
3. The name is absent
4. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
9. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
10. The name is absent