Table 3
The Newman-Keuls multiple comparison for subjects' partial-report
performance at the 0-msec ISI in various sessions and their whole-report
performance (Experiment 1)
WRa |
P1b |
Session P2c |
T1d |
T2e | ||
3.52 |
4.64 |
5.62 |
5.85 |
6.38 | ||
WR |
3.52 |
1.12 |
2.10* |
2.33* |
2.86 | |
P1 |
4.64 |
0.98 |
1.21 |
1.74 | ||
P2 |
5.62 |
0.23 |
0.76 | |||
T1 |
5.86 |
0.53 |
aWR = whole report; bP1 = first practice session; cP2 = second practice session
dT1 = first test session; eT2 = second test session; *Significant at 0.05 level by the
Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. The critical values for two-, three-, four-, and
five-step differences are 1.41, 1.70, 1.88 and 1.99, respectively.
Discussion
Results from this experiment differ from those of Merikle's (1980) study as a result of an
important procedural difference. When the partial-report cue was presented before or
simultaneously with stimulus onset, Merikle obtained data consistent with the
display-instruction compatibility hypothesis. When the partial-report cue was presented
(in accordance with the methodological assumption of the partial-report task; see
Coltheart, 1980) at or after stimulus offset, the compatibility hypothesis was not
supported. It can be suggested that the display-instruction compatibility hypothesis is
incorrect.
It is observed here that the basic large-capacity finding is obtained only when subjects
have 96 trials of practice on the partial-report task. This procedural feature should no
longer be ignored in future applications of the partial-report task.
EXPERIMENT 2
Why is the basic sensory fording observed by some investigators (e.g., Sperling, 1960;
Turvey & Kravetz, 1970; von Wright, 1968), but not by others (e.g., Dick, 1969, 1971,
1974; Merikle, 1980)? Although we have rejected the display-instruction compatibility
hypothesis as an explanation of the large-capacity finding, it remains to be seen whether
the perceptual grouping hypothesis can account for the basic sensory finding.
Merikle (1980) gave his subjects a circular array of eight alphanumeric items for 50
msec. Four of the eight items were letters, and four were digits. On half of the occasions,
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
3. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
7. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
8. The name is absent
9. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
10. The name is absent