The name is absent



5 (sessions) ANOVA with repeated measures on the latter two factors. (For this analysis,
only the session factor and all interactions involving session are meaningful.) As can be
seen from Table 3, partial-report superiority was not observed in Session 1. It was only in
subsequent sessions that partial-report superiority was found.

Table 2

The Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test Between Subject' Partial-Report
Performance of Various Levels of ISI and Whole Report (Experiment 1)

WRa

1000b

500b

150b

0b

Recall by Row Group

3.58

4.01

4.65

5.78

6.78

WR 3.58

0.43

1.07

2.20*

3.20*

1000   4.01

0.64

__*
1.77*

2.77*

500    4.65

1.13*

2.12*

150    5.78

Recall by Column Group

3.51

3.98

4.21

5.11

5.47

WR 3.51

0.47

0.70

1.60*

1.96*

1000    3.98

0.23

1.13

1.49*

500    4.21

0.99

1.26

150    5.11

0.36

aWR=Whole report; b1000=ISI value

*Significant at the 0.5 level by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparision test. The critical
values for two-, three- and five-step diffeences are 1.09, 1.32, 1.45, and 1.55,
respectively.

Figure 4. Subject's
partial-report
performance at the 0-
msec ISI as a function of
session of testing in
Experiment 1.



More intriguing information

1. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
2. The name is absent
3. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
4. The name is absent
5. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
6. The name is absent
7. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
8. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
9. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
10. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry