The name is absent



5 (sessions) ANOVA with repeated measures on the latter two factors. (For this analysis,
only the session factor and all interactions involving session are meaningful.) As can be
seen from Table 3, partial-report superiority was not observed in Session 1. It was only in
subsequent sessions that partial-report superiority was found.

Table 2

The Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test Between Subject' Partial-Report
Performance of Various Levels of ISI and Whole Report (Experiment 1)

WRa

1000b

500b

150b

0b

Recall by Row Group

3.58

4.01

4.65

5.78

6.78

WR 3.58

0.43

1.07

2.20*

3.20*

1000   4.01

0.64

__*
1.77*

2.77*

500    4.65

1.13*

2.12*

150    5.78

Recall by Column Group

3.51

3.98

4.21

5.11

5.47

WR 3.51

0.47

0.70

1.60*

1.96*

1000    3.98

0.23

1.13

1.49*

500    4.21

0.99

1.26

150    5.11

0.36

aWR=Whole report; b1000=ISI value

*Significant at the 0.5 level by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparision test. The critical
values for two-, three- and five-step diffeences are 1.09, 1.32, 1.45, and 1.55,
respectively.

Figure 4. Subject's
partial-report
performance at the 0-
msec ISI as a function of
session of testing in
Experiment 1.



More intriguing information

1. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
2. The name is absent
3. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
4. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
5. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
6. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
7. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES
8. Picture recognition in animals and humans
9. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
10. The name is absent