Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS



Children's Attributions 10

example, graph 4 can be seen as a plausible representation of people living in a society where the
concept of God as omniscient is not very widespread.

Finally, moving on to the last graph in Figure 1, a non-similarity perspective would
predict that children being tested on the false-belief task would start differentiating between
humans and God very early in development. This is the position that Justin Barrett and
collaborators have been advocating (Barrett et al., 2001; Richert & Barrett, 2003; see also Atran,
2002). Their main idea is that young children do not need to conceptualize human agency first
and then use it as a basis to understand supernatural agency; rather young children have already
the potential to think independently about different types of agents and reason accordingly. In
graph 5, the God line remains close to floor level, which signifies that children from an early age
attribute mostly true beliefs to God - i.e., that God knows that there are rocks in the box. The
human line, on the other hand, starts at the same level as the God line but then by the age of 4
steeply climbs - children increasingly say that humans believe that the box contains crackers, as
their capacity to attribute false beliefs improves.

Experimental data from the United States supports the prediction of this non-similarity
position (Barrett et al., 2001). In figure 2, the results of a surprising contents experiment run with
a sample of American children recruited from Reformed and Lutheran Protestant churches are
presented. Children in the US sample can be seen to treat humans and God in the same way up to
age 4. By age 5, they already sharply differentiate between the two agents. The divergence
between God and the mother took place as children started to attribute false beliefs to the latter.
A Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for matched pairs comparing “crackers” responses between
mother and God at each specific age detected significant differences only for 5- and 6-year-olds
(z = 2.37, p = .018, N = 17 and z = 2.93, p = .003, N = 9, respectively).



More intriguing information

1. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
2. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
3. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
4. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
5. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke
9. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
10. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
11. The name is absent
12. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
13. Markets for Influence
14. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
15. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
16. The name is absent
17. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
18. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
19. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
20. The name is absent