Children's Attributions 13
question about behavior - “Where would agent X look for object Y?” instead of “Where would
agent X think the object is located?”
5. Results
Answers were coded as 1 when children said “tortillas” and 0 when they said “shorts.”
The percentage of children answering “tortillas” in each age group for the doll and God is shown
in figure 3.
FIGURE 3 ABOUT HERE.
The answers for the doll showed a statistically significant positive correlation with age
[r(46) = .341]. Therefore, as age increased, Maya children were more likely to attribute false
beliefs to the doll. For example, 33% of the 4-year-olds said that the doll would think tortillas
were in the container compared to 77% of 7-year-olds. In contrast, children treated God
differently from the doll - as in the US, no significant correlation was detected between answers
for God and age [r(46) = .066]. A Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for matched pairs comparing
“tortillas” responses found significant differences between God and the doll for 5-year-olds [z = -
2.000, p = .046, N = 12] and 7-year-olds [z = -2.449, p = .014, N = 13], but not for 4- and 6-year
olds.
When looking at the results, some patterns become apparent. The human line follows the
same developmental course in both samples, but the Maya children seem to reliably pass the task
about a year later than the American children. In the Maya sample, the difference between God
More intriguing information
1. Should informal sector be subsidised?2. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
7. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
8. The name is absent
9. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
10. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case