Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-prints Repository
Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
Stephen Gorard
School of Education
University of Birmingham
[email protected]
Keywords
Participation, British Household Panel Survey, scepticism, statistical judgement, pupil
attitudes
Abstract
Are the early expressed attitudes of pupils to staying on in education post-16 a
valuable predictor? This is an important question, because if such attitudes are very
likely to be converted into subsequent revealed actions then the early attitudes provide
a sound basis for planning and intervention. This short paper queries the scientific
accuracy of claims made in a previous paper by Croll (2010) based on a re-analysis of
the British Household Panel Survey. It shows that even if the expressed intentions of
young people to stay on in education post-16 were actually unrelated to their
subsequent participation, the figures used by Croll would still display a substantial
overlap between the two. This is because both reported intentions to stay on and
subsequent participation are heavily imbalanced in favour of staying on. If this
imbalance is taken into account then Croll’s conclusions, that early intentions are
accurate and useful, fall to the ground. On these data, we should take little or no
account of early expressed intentions to study post-16.