156
D. Bo6et, J. Vauclair/Beha6ioural Brain Research 109 (2000) 143-165
did not display social behaviour toward pictures of
conspecifics [27,47] and ducklings did not react to the
pictures in exactly the same way as they did with decoys
[57]. In other experiments, behaviours were indicative
of picture discrimination [79,84] but were not specifi-
cally directed toward the stimuli. While visual experi-
ence with real locations can facilitate the discrimination
of photographs by pigeons, and vice versa, it is not yet
clear how this facilitation occurs.
Table 3 summarises the methods, species and main
results of the studies that could be indicative of picture
recognition in animal species.
5. Difficulty with picture recognition
This section reviews those studies which show a
difficulty or failure of the subject to react to 2-D stimuli
as if they were meaningful or 3-D stimuli.
5.1. Spontaneous responses
It is important to note that socially salient stimuli
presented as pictures do not always elicit overt re-
sponses in birds or even in monkeys. Butler and
Woolpy [9] studied visual attention in rhesus monkeys
submitted to various slides or motion pictures of other
rhesus monkeys but their results are not easy to inter-
pret because they appear to be quite contradictory; the
amount of visual attention given to slides of conspe-
cifics was not different from attention devoted to an
homogeneous illuminated screen. Such a result seems to
imply that the monkeys did not recognise the slide as
representing one of their conspecifics although viewing
behaviour (and thus attention) was more important (i.e.
monkeys looked longer) when motion pictures were
projected in the normal orientation than when they
were projected upside-down.
Table 3
Experiments which could indicate picture recognition in animals
Task |
Nature of pictures |
Species |
Results |
Reference |
Behavioural observations |
Paintings |
Dog |
Sniffing the areas normally investi- |
Fox [36] |
Behavioural observations |
Life-size colour slides and |
Sheep |
Following images of conspecifics |
Franklin and Hutson [37] |
Transfer of discrimination of two |
Colour slides |
Pigeon |
Transfer occurs |
Honig and Ouellette [45] |
real places | ||||
Choice between two visual stimuli |
Colour slides and films |
Rhesus monkey |
Consistent choice |
Humphrey [47] |
(plain field or various stimuli) | ||||
Novelty preference |
Slides |
Rhesus monkey |
Discrimination of individuals de- |
Humphrey [48] |
Electrophysiological recording |
Colour slides and black-and- |
Sheep |
Specifics cells in the temporal cor- |
Kendrick and Baldwin [53] |
Behavioural observations |
Colour film |
Pekin duckling |
Spontaneous following of moving |
Klopfer [57] |
Transfer of discrimination between |
Cut-out photograph and line |
Pigeon |
Same type of curve depending on |
Lumsden [64] |
Measurement of time spent in |
Colour slides |
Dark-eyed junco |
Spontaneous choice of appropriate |
Roberts and Weigl [79] |
Measurement of female interest |
Colour video images |
Green swordtail |
Frequency of behavior patterns in |
Rosenthal et al. |
Discrimination between faces of |
Colour photographs |
Pigtail macaque |
Difficulty recognizing inverted |
Swartz [93] |
Discrimination between faces of |
Colour video still pictures |
Chimpanzee |
Difficulty recognizing inverted |
Tomonaga et |
viduals | ||||
Discrimination between pictures of |
Colour slides |
Pigeon |
Discrimination between pictures |
Wilkie et al. |
Discrimination between pictures of |
Colour slides |
Pigeon |
Discrimination between pictures |
Willson et al. |