164
D. Bo6et, J. Vauclair/Beha6ioural Brain Research 109 (2000) 143-165
[43] von Heusser H. Ein frei gehaltener Krallenaffe (Callithrix jac-
chus) erkennt Bilder. Zeitsch Tierpsychol 1968;25:710-8.
[44] Hochberg J, Brooks V. Pictorial recognition as an unlearned
ability: a study of one child’s performance. Am J Psychol
1962;75:624-8.
[45] Honig WK, Ouellette G. Seeing there and being there: pigeons
transfer a discrimination of pictured locations to the real world,
Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Psycho-
nomic Society 1989, Atlanta, GA.
[46] Hood BM, Willen JD, Driver J. Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of
visual attention in human infants. Psychol Sci 1998;9:131 - 4.
[47] Humphrey NK. ‘Interest’ and ‘pleasure’: two determinants of a
monkey’s visual preferences. Perception 1972;1:395 - 416.
[48] Humphrey NK. Species and individuals in the perceptual world
of monkeys. Perception 1974;3:105 - 14.
[49] Jenssen TA. Female response to filmed displays of Anolis
nebulosus (sauria, iguanidae). Anim Behav 1970;18:640 - 7.
[50] Jitsumori M. Do monkeys see meaningful objects in slide
pictures? In: Eharu A, et al., editors. Primatology Today.
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991:293 - 6.
[51] Jitsumori M, Ohkubo O. Orientation discrimination and cate-
gorization of photographs of natural objects by pigeons. Behav
Proc 1996;38:205 - 26.
[52] Kaye KL, Bower TGR. Learning and intermodal transfer of
information in newborns. Psychol Sci 1994;5:286 - 8.
[53] Kendrick KM, Baldwin BA. Cells in temporal cortex of con-
scious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces.
Science 1987;236:448-50.
[54] Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Broad KD, Fabre-Nys
C, Keverne B. Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim
Behav 1995;49:1665 - 76.
[55] Kennedy JM. Is gradual recognition of pictures by Ethiopian
subjects a differentiation process or a pattern construction
process? Perception 1974;3:29 - 31.
[56] Kidd D. The Essential Kafir. London: A and C. Black, 1904.
[57] Klopfer PH. Imprinting: determining its perceptual basis on
ducklings. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1971;75:378 - 85.
[58] Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF. Repeatability of female choice
in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males. Anim
Behav 1997;54:369-76.
[59] Kyes RC, Candland DK. Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual
preferences for socially relevant stimuli. Int J Primat
1984;5:355.
[60] Kyes RC, Mayer KE, Bunnell BN. Perception of stimuli pre-
sented as photographic slides in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca
fascicularis). Primates 1992;33:407 - 12.
[61] Lack D. The Life of the Robin. London: Cambridge University
Press, 1943.
[62] Looney TA, Cohen PS. Pictorial target control of schedule-in-
duced attack in White Carneaux pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav
1974;21:571-84.
[63] Lubow RE. High-order concept formation in the pigeon. J Exp
Anal Behav 1974;21:475 - 83.
[64] Lumsden EA. Generalization of an operant response to photo-
graphs and drawings silhouettes of a 3-D object at various
orientations. Bull Psychon Soc 1977;10:405 - 507.
[65] Macedonia JM, Evans CS, Losos JB. Male Anolis discriminate
video-recorded conspecific and heterospecific displays. Anim
Behav 1994;47:1220 - 3.
[66] Malone DR, Tolan JC, Rogers CM. Cross-modal matching of
objects and photographs in the monkey. Neuropsychology
1980;18:693-7.
[67] McQuoid LM, Galef BG Jr. Social stimuli influencing feeding
behaviour of Burmese fowl: a video analysis. Anim Behav
1993;46:13-22.
[68] Menzel EW, Premack D, Woodruff G. Map reading in chim-
panzee. Folia Primatol 1978;29:241 -9.
[69] Menzel ES, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Lawson J. Chimpanzee
(Pan troglodytes) spatial problem solving with the use of mir-
rors and televised equivalents of mirrors. J Comp Psychol
1985;99:211 - 7.
[70] Miller RJ. Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial
materials. Psychol Bull 1973;80:135-50.
[71] Nelson CA, De Haan M. Neural correlates of infants’ visual
responsiveness to facial expressions of emotion. Dev Psychobiol
1996;29:577 - 95.
[72] Overman WH, Doty RW. Hemispheric specialization displayed
by man but not macaques for analyses of faces. Neuropsychol-
ogy 1982;20:113-28.
[73] Patterson-Kane E, Nicol CJ, Forster TM, Temple W. Limited
perception of video images by domestic hens. Anim Behav
1997;53:951 - 63.
[74] Perrett DI, Mistlin AJ. Perception of facial characteristics by
monkeys. In: Stebbins WC, Berkley MA, editors. Comparative
Perception. New York: Wiley, 1990:187 - 215.
[75] Perrett DI, Oram MW, Harries MH, Bevan R, Hietamen JK,
Benson PJ, Thomas S. Viewer-centred and object-centred cod-
ing of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res
1991;47:329 - 42.
[76] Pipp SL, Haith MM. Infant scanning of two- and three-dimen-
sional forms. Child Dev 1977;48:1640 - 4.
[77] Plimpton EH, Swartz KB, Rosenblum LA. Responses of juve-
nile bonnet macaques to social stimuli presented through color
videotapes. Dev Psychobiol 1979;14:1009 - 15.
[78] Premack D, Woodruff G. Chimpanzee problem-solving: A test
for comprehension. Science 1978;202:532 - 5.
[79] Roberts EPJr, Weigl PD. Habitat preference in the dark-eyed
junco (Junco hyemalis): The role of photoperiod and domi-
nance. Anim Behav 1984;32:709 - 14.
[80] Roberts WA, Mazmanian DS. Concept learning at different
levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. J Exp
Psychol Anim Behav Proc 1988;14:247-60.
[81] Rose SA. Infants’ transfer of response between two-dimen-
sional and three-dimensional stimuli. Child Dev 1977;48:1086 -
91.
[82] Rose SA, Gottfried AW, Bridger WH. Infants’ cross-modal
transfer from solid objects to their graphic representations.
Child Dev 1983;54:686 - 94.
[83] Rosenfeld SA, van Hoesen GW. Face recognition in the rhesus
monkey. Neuropsychology 1979;17:503 - 9.
[84] Rosenthal GG, Evans CS, Miller WL. Female preference for
dynamic traits in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri. Anim
Behav 1996;51:811 - 20.
[85] Rowland WJ. Do female stickleback care about male courtship
vigour? Manipulation of display tempo using video playback.
Behaviour 1995;132:13-4.
[86] Ryan CME, Lea SEG. Images of conspecifics as categories to
be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: slides, video tapes,
stuffed birds and live birds. Behav Proc 1994;33:155 - 75.
[87] Sackett GP. Response of rhesus monkeys to social stimulation
by means of coloured slides. Percept Mot Skills 1965;20:1027 -
8.
[88] Sackett GP. Monkeys reared in isolation with pictures as visual
input: evidence for an innate releasing mechanism. Science
1966;154:1468 - 72.
[89] Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Smith ST, Lawson J.
Reference: the linguistic essential. Science 1980;210:920 - 5.
[90] Shimizu T. Conspecific recognition in pigeons (Columbia li6ia)
using dynamic video images. Behaviour 1998;135:43 - 53.
[91] Slater A, Rose D, Morrison V. Newborn infants’ perception of
similarities and differences between two- and three-dimensional
stimuli. Br J Dev Psychol 1984;2:287-94.
[92] Streri A, Molina M. Visual - tactual and tactual - visual transfer
between objects and pictures in 2-month-old infants. Perception
1993;22:1299-318.