educated on the study to be carried out.
Also, informed consent was obtained from
all the girls and the school authorities before
the study was carried out.
Statistical Analysis:
Means, standard deviations and simple
percentage were determined. Z-score was
used to test for significance level, since the
sample size was large. In all cases a 5% level
of error was assumed and 95% level of
confidence accommodated with a critical
value of 1.96 on a two-tailed distribution or
a critical value of 1.64 on a one-tailed
distribution.
Results
There was a statistically significant lower
mean menarchial age in urban school girls
compared to the rural school girls (Z-score
=10.22, Table 1). In both urban and rural
areas, school girls from high socio-economic
class had significantly lower mean
menarchial age compared to their
counterparts from low socio-economic class
(Z score = 13.89 and 7.68, respectively, Table
2). In the rural area, school girls involved in
vigorous sport activity had a higher age of
menarche compared to girls in non-sporting
activity (Z = 9.75, Table 3)
Table 1: Mean menarchial age in urban and rural secondary school girls
Urban |
Rural |
Z = score | |
Menarchial age (years) |
13.19 ± 1.32 |
14.22 ± 1.47 |
10.22* |
Values are mean ± S D; *Statistically significant
Table 2: Mean menarchial age (years) of high, middle and low socio-economic class school
girls in the urban and rural areas
High |
Middle |
Low |
High Vs Low Z - |
Middle Vs Low Z - | |
Urban area |
13.06±1.35 |
13.08±1.27 |
13.70±1.18 (n =51) |
18.89* |
7.29* |
Rural area |
13.98±1.46 (n=61) |
14.10±1.59 |
14.38±1.42 |
7.68* |
-1.54NS |
Values are Mean ± SD; *Significant; NS = Not significant
Table 3: Relationship between menarchial age (years) and sporting activity
_________Sporting_________ |
______Non- sporting______ |
Z-score | |
Urban |
13.10 ± 1.27 (n = 284) |
12.98 ± 1.40 (n = 224) |
-1.12 Ns |
Rural |
14.61 ± 1.34 (n = 211) |
14.09 ± 1.57 (n = 140) |
____________9.75*____________ |
Values are Mean ± SD
Discussion
Data from the present study shows a
statistically significant lower mean
menarchial age (13.89 ± 1.37 years) for urban
secondary school girls than the mean value
for the rural school girls (14.22 ± 1.47 years).
This is consistent with the observation of Lin
et al7, that urban Chinese girls had a lower
menarchial age than their rural
counterparts. A number of factors may have
contributed to this difference. Socio-
economic factor was investigated in this
study and it was observed that school girls
from a high socio-economic class had a
statistically significant lower mean age of
menarche compared to those in low Socio-
economic class. Ikechebelu8 had earlier
noted lower age of menarche in girls of high
socio-economic status than those of low
socio-economic class. It seems that the socio-
economic status affects menarchial age, and
this may account for the significant
difference in menarchial age between urban
and rural school girls, since 56.6% (133) of
the rural school girls were within the low
More intriguing information
1. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France2. The name is absent
3. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
4. The name is absent
5. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
6. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
7. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
8. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
9. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
10. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis