fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences



Figure 1. Sequence task setup. (a) In 2x6 sequence task, a sequence of 12 key presses
is learned by trial and error, two at a time (called a ‘set’) in a series of six sets (called
a ‘hyperset’). The two key presses belonging to a set need to be executed within 3 sec
and after an appropriate delay the subsequent set is displayed. A new trial is started by
resetting the presentation of the hyperset to the beginning either upon an error in any
set or on successful completion of the entire hyperset. The bottom panel indicates the
correct order of key presses for the example shown in the top panel. (b)
Normal and
Rotated settings for set 1 of the example are shown. In the normal setting the visual
display and keypad are arranged in the usual upright position and in the
rotated
settings the display-to-keypad relationship was altered. In the visual setting, the
keypad was
rotated by 180°, while the display remained unaltered. In the motor
setting both the keypad and the display on the screen were rotated by 180°.
Consequently, in the
visual setting the sequence of visuo-spatial cues (visuo-spatial
sequence) remained identical, while in the
motor setting the sequence of finger
movements (somato-motor sequence) remained the same as that of the
normal setting.
Finger movements to be executed for an example are indicated by arrows in all the
settings in the lower panel. Six such sets constituted a hyperset as shown in panel
a.
(c) Subjects performed two experiments - visual-normal and motor-normal. Each
experiment consisted of six sessions of which the first two and the last two

represented ' early' and ' late' stages of learning, respectively. We utilized an on-off
(box-car) design for the experiments. In every session, subjects alternated between
sequence learning tasks in the test blocks (N:
normal and R: rotated) and followed
random visual cues in the control blocks (F:
follow). The duration of the test block
was 36 sec and that of control block was 21 sec. 12 and 7 scans were acquired during
the test and control blocks, respectively. Scans identified in gray shade represent
instruction scans at the beginning and end of a block.



More intriguing information

1. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
2. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
3. The name is absent
4. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
8. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
9. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
10. The name is absent
11. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
15. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
16. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
17. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
18. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
19. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
20. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -