The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency



13. What do you have to be (sorts of qualities) to be good or bad in this school?

The most cited were Work Hard (16), then Be Focussed (10). Listening (8) and
Cooperating (7) were next, followed by Communication Skills (7). Next were Respecting
Others (6) and then Being Independent (6) and Sociable (5). Students only mentioned
‘good’ qualities.

14. Do you think teachers show you or teach you how to be a good character?

This question was asked in order to understand in what ways students believed that a
teacher demonstrates character or instructs students to develop their characters, if at all.
Many responses were positive. Many students pointed to the example of teachers who
insisted on uniform and self-presentation (13). Others were admired for their capacity to
motivate and encourage a love of what you do (7), to inspire Commitment (6) and
Punctuality (5). Some felt that teachers didn’t address character at all (10). The question
was answered with some enthusiasm and without complication.

15. What are the pressures in the world that might force you to overlook good
values?

This was a direct approach to ascertaining any perceived block to positive character
development. The main pressures are ‘Peer Pressure’ and ‘Exams’. The word ‘Stress’
was used in many instances. Some students confessed to often spending significant
amounts of time on the web or computer games.

16. How secure and happy do you feel in your local environment?

This question was asked to assess the impact of physical security on character. There
were only two positive comments on being happy and two students who said they liked
school. Most responses concerned physical threats (25), distrust of others (18), and
vulnerability of females (9). There was no doubt here answers were not masked or
ambivalent.

The findings from the interviews with the young people led in part to the formulation of
the first questionnaire. Questions were also carried forward from the Bristol report. For
example, the categories used in Question 1 of the phase two questionnaire were partly
derived from responses to Question 1 in the interviews, and siblings, teachers and friends
were included from the Bristol report.

27



More intriguing information

1. Valuing Farm Financial Information
2. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY
3. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
4. The constitution and evolution of the stars
5. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
6. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
7. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
8. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
9. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
10. The name is absent
11. Constrained School Choice
12. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
13. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
14. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
15. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
16. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
17. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
18. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
19. Imitation in location choice
20. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)