Principal Component One - general positiveness
As is frequently the case the main differences between respondents were largely a matter
of how positive they were across all questions. The degree of emphasis placed on each
question can be seen from the component loadings shown in Appendix 8a. Questions
indicating a positive self-image and pro-social attitudes are especially important in
Principal Component One (PC1). Those with the higher loadings contribute more to the
differences between students.
In general the overall positiveness factor is of little interest and requires no detailed
interpretation. Its chief contribution to interpretation is to allow more subtle differences
to be detected once general positiveness has been discounted. In looking for the subtleties,
a student who Strongly Agrees with most questions but only Agrees with a particular
question needs to be seen as less ‘positive’ on the particular point than someone who
usually Disagrees but on this particular questions Neither Agrees nor Disagrees. It needs
to be born in mind that on average Muslim students scored relatively high on PC1 (see
Appendix 8a); so when, later in the analysis, they tend towards positive responses to
some questions and negative to others, it is usually the case that their ‘negative’
responses are comparable with the ‘positive’ responses of other students.
Principal Component Two - family, school and community versus self-concept
The second Principal Component (PC2) looks beyond general positiveness to find the
next major differences between students. This takes the form of a contrast between those
who favour one group of questions relative to another and those who favour the other
relative to the one. These groups can be identified from the component loadings in
Appendix 8b as those with high positive values and those with high negative values.
(There is no real-world significance in which group is positive and which negative only
in the fact that they are contrasted matters).
In this survey the contrast was between on the one hand those who gave relatively more
positive responses to questions about engagement with the family, school and community:
I help out in my community
Community Leaders have an influence on my attitude towards life
My school gets us to discuss local community issues
My local neighbourhood influences how I behave
People in Media have an influence on my attitude towards life
I take part in school run community projects
I have found school trips/residential trips make me a better person
I am a member of a club or community organisation outside school
Citizenship is a useful subject in my school
I think the newspapers change my view of the world
Other family members have an influence on my attitude towards life
To be successful where I live you have to fit in
I would like more time in school to discuss my ideas and learn about myself
I prefer to fit in with the views of others
A good person is intelligent
My teachers help me to think about being a good person
44
More intriguing information
1. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G72. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
3. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
4. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
5. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
6. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
7. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
8. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
9. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
10. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11