Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*



Figure 2: A visual representation of the training stimuli used to train the networks. Each
square represents one stimulus unit, and the area filled in black is proportional to the
activation of the unit, so that a white square means minimum activation and a completely
filled one full activation.

to the training stimuli. A more detailed presentation of the stimuli and targets we
have used is given in the next section.

Prior to training each network has to be given some initial set of connections
on which the chosen learning procedure will act, and this will affect to some ex-
tent its response properties. That this effect exists is both trivial and important,
for the initial state of the network has a natural counterpart in the animal’s state
before training. This latter state is the result of both genetic and individual his-
tory factors, which are of course able to affect behaviour (see e.g. Peterson, 1962;
Mason & Reidinger, 1983, for examples relevant to stimulus control). What the
initial connections should be to model a real situation is not well understood, and
we resort simply on setting weights at random in the interval [-0.1, 0.1], with uni-
form distribution. With these settings the data emerging from the simulations will
be best compared with experiments in which no strong pre-existing bias affected
generalization performance. On the other hand we can be sure that the observed
features, for instance the shape of gradients, are truly due to the training procedure
and not to the initial connection values.

3 Training and Testing

This section illustrates what stimuli we have used to train the networks, and what
tests have been devised to investigate their generalization abilities, relating both
of these steps to actual experimental situations; we consider the training first.

3.1 Training Stimuli

To start, we focus for simplicity on just two stimuli (i.e. a single discrimination
task), noted
s+ and s- (see figure 2). The positive stimulus differs from the neg-
ative one in its central region, that we call for short the ‘signal’. The activation
of the input units increases towards the centre of the signal. This models the fact
that a given stimulus usually activates the receptor cells to different extents, there
being cells that are most active, some that are mildly active, and some that are
unaffected. The networks are trained to have a high output to
s+ and a low one



More intriguing information

1. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
2. The name is absent
3. Draft of paper published in:
4. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Constrained School Choice
8. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
9. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
10. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
11. Job quality and labour market performance
12. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
13. The name is absent
14. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
15. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
16. The name is absent
17. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
18. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
19. The name is absent
20. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers