The name is absent



40


M. Wilke et al.: Risk Specificity for Risk-Defusing Operators


Umweltveranderungen WBGU (1999). Welt im Wandel: Der
Umgang mit globalen Umweltrisiken
[A changing world: How
to deal with global environmental risks]. Berlin: Springer.

Yates, J. F. (1992). Risk taking behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Zaleskiewicz, T., Piskorz, Z., & Borkowska, A. (2002). Fear or
money? Decisions on insuring oneself against flood.
Risk, De-
cision & Policy, 7,
221-233.


Joachim Funke


Department of Psychology

University of Heidelberg

Hauptstraβe 47-51

DE-69117 Heidelberg

[email protected]


Appendix

Sample Scenario “Avian Flu Pandemic”

[The original text was written in German.]

You are a member of the Robert Koch Institute. This is the
central institution of the German government in the area of
disease control and prevention. The Institute has to decide
how to deal with a potential avian flu pandemic in Germany.
Avian flu is a viral illness that affects birds, especially chick-
ens and turkeys. The contamination from animal to human
through close contact with infected animals can lead to a
mixture of human and animal influenza virus material when
humans and animals are infected simultaneously. That is
how the virus can be transmitted from human to human.

Avian flu, which started in Asia, is now also present in
Europe. The first cases have been registered in Germany.
The situation is problematic insofar as no adequate vaccine
is available. Pharmaceutical companies are working on a
vaccine for humans, but it is unknown if it will be ready im-
mediately in the event of a pandemic. The vaccination has
strong side effects on the brains of people vaccinated with
it. Your task is to decide whether such a vaccination should
be continued in Germany.

Alternative A: You decide to stop the current vaccination
and try to prevent the upcoming pandemic by means of a
quarantine. If this is not successful, the pandemic will start
immediately.

Alternative B: You decide that the current vaccination
should be continued in order to prevent a potential pandemic
as quickly as possible. But, at the same time, you accept the
strong side effects of this procedure and risk the lives of
many healthy individuals.

What information do you need to make your final deci-
sion?

Swiss J Psychol 67 (1), © 2008 by Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG, Bern



More intriguing information

1. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
2. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
3. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
4. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
5. Long-Term Capital Movements
6. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.
7. The name is absent
8. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
9. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
10. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
11. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
12. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
13. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
14. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
15. The name is absent
16. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
17. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
18. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
19. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
20. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes