End To End Delay
Figure 4.27 shows the end to end delays as a function of group size. The bigger value of
delay the less efficient the protocol. In reality, SReM shows lower delay in comparison with
Xcast+. This is because scalability feature in SReM make the intermediate nodes to forward
the data packets faster where in Xcast+ the data packets will take high processing time in the
intermediate nodes which lastly will increase the delay for the data packets arrival at the end
nodes.
Delay
→-SReM
—■— Xca st+
Group size(LM Rs/Receivers)
Figure 4.27 End to End Delay.
95
More intriguing information
1. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data2. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
3. Who runs the IFIs?
4. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
5. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
6. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
7. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
8. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
9. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
10. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon