End To End Delay
Figure 4.27 shows the end to end delays as a function of group size. The bigger value of
delay the less efficient the protocol. In reality, SReM shows lower delay in comparison with
Xcast+. This is because scalability feature in SReM make the intermediate nodes to forward
the data packets faster where in Xcast+ the data packets will take high processing time in the
intermediate nodes which lastly will increase the delay for the data packets arrival at the end
nodes.
Delay
→-SReM
—■— Xca st+
Group size(LM Rs/Receivers)
Figure 4.27 End to End Delay.
95
More intriguing information
1. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
6. Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment
7. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
8. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
9. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
10. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model