End To End Delay
Figure 4.27 shows the end to end delays as a function of group size. The bigger value of
delay the less efficient the protocol. In reality, SReM shows lower delay in comparison with
Xcast+. This is because scalability feature in SReM make the intermediate nodes to forward
the data packets faster where in Xcast+ the data packets will take high processing time in the
intermediate nodes which lastly will increase the delay for the data packets arrival at the end
nodes.
Delay
→-SReM
—■— Xca st+
Group size(LM Rs/Receivers)
Figure 4.27 End to End Delay.
95
More intriguing information
1. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany2. The name is absent
3. Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities
4. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
5. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
6. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
7. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
8. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
9. The name is absent
10. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data