Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks



-I- First, a basic packet (BP) with a size of maximum transfer unit (MTU) is used a
benchmark. The BP is a packet which has an IP header, with one source and one
destination, and its payload.

-I- Secondly, Multicast packets (MPs) are always of a bigger size than a BP due to the
fact that there might be a multicast group address or a protocol header in the multicast
packets. However, the control messages (CMs) (in SEM and SReM) are usually of a
size of less than MTU (for SEM) or far less than MTU (for SReM). For simplicity,
we treat them as multicast packets with a size of MTU.

-I- Thirdly, assuming that the processing cost to be 1 ( unit ) if a packet with a size of
BP is needed to be processed at a node and the delivering cost of this packet to be 1
as well if it is delivered via a link with a cost of 1.

Depending on the previous assumptions, the processing cost at node k is given by

S

Pcos t (Nk ) = MkMP × — + M ,                         (1)

S BP

where M and M are the number of destinations in multicast packets and that in
M k , MP            k,CM

control messages at node k, S MP and S BP are the size of a multicast packet and the size
of a BP (i.e. MTU), respectively. In this simulation, the values of MTU fixed at 576 octets,
i.e., the minimum size of packets required for routers. When the size of multicast packets is
over MTU, a fragment processing for packets is needed, which might happen for Xcast
multicast packets, but not being considered in our simulation.

Correspondingly, the delivering cost for one multicast packet over a link i is given by

S

D cos t ( Li) = Li × ( -M^ + J1Cm ),                                      (2)

S BP

WhereJ i,CM and L i are the number of destinations in control messages and the cost over
a link
I, respectively.

Based on previous discussion, the average processing cost ( p cos t ) at a node and average
delivering cost (
Dra t ) over a link are given by,

P c0s t = ɪ Pcost ( Nt ),                                                               (3)

cost t

N tT

84



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
5. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
6. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?
7. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
8. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
9. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
10. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
11. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
12. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
13. The name is absent
14. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
15. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
16. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
20. The name is absent