A third general category of somatosensory fMRI studies use automated
mechanical stimulation. Pneumatic systems have been used effectively (Briggs, et al.
2004; Stippich, et al. 1999), although only at low frequency of stimulation. A hydraulic
system has also been described (Golaszewski, et al. 2002) with a slightly greater range of
stimulation frequency, but still less than 130Hz, and with a minimum displacement of
0.5mm, unsuitable for near-threshold studies. It is also possible to use Lorentz-forces
created by the scanner to generate vibration, although each device will only work at a
fixed distance outside the bore of the scanner (Graham, et al. 2001). Custom-built
motorized devices that are constructed of non-ferrous metal, with the motor placed
well away from the scanner bore, can be used to deliver precise stimuli, such as a
grating or embossed letters to a single body part, typically the finger tip (Burton, et al.
2006; Burton, et al. 2004; Ingeholm, et al. 2006).
Another popular solution is piezoelectric devices (Gizewski, et al. 2005;
Harrington, et al. 2000). Although piezoelectrics have been dismissed as having too little
displacement to provide robust tactile stimulation (Briggs, et al. 2004; Graham, et al.
2001), modern devices are capable of displacements of over a millimeter and have the
advantages of a wide range of possible stimulation frequencies and amplitudes (up to
several mm). Most MR-CompatibIe somatosensory stimulators (piezoelectricor
otherwise) are capable of stimulating only a single body region at a time. Because the
somatosensory system is organized Somatotopically, there are advantages to delivering
stimuli to many body parts in a single experiment. For instance, it allows a more
complete delineation of the extent of somatosensory cortex and raises the possibility of
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Food Prices and Overweight Patterns in Italy
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
7. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
8. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent