The name is absent



Figure 7.8: Compressibility factors of the bulk star polymer fluids, (a) 3-arm star
polymers with m = 3 (∙) and 5
(à), and (b) 4-arm star polymers with m = 3 (∙) and 5

end-segments comprise all the arm segments. Density of the end-segments for both
the molecular topologies are higher near the surface compared to the mid-segments.
On the contrary, densities of the mid-segments are enhanced at z = 1
σ. Both the
end- and mid-segment densities of the linear polymer near the surface are higher than
those of the 3-arm star polymer, due to higher conformational restriction on the star
polymer to pack against the surface. This is also observed in figures 7.7c and d, where
the average end- and mid-segments densities near the surface of both the 3-arm and
4-arm star polymers are lower than that of the linear polymer. Comparison of the
end- and mid-segments density profile of the star polymer fluids themselves, shows
that as the number of arms in the star polymer increases (keeping the total number of

204



More intriguing information

1. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
5. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
6. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
7. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
8. The name is absent
9. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
10. The name is absent