The name is absent



Figure 7.8: Compressibility factors of the bulk star polymer fluids, (a) 3-arm star
polymers with m = 3 (∙) and 5
(à), and (b) 4-arm star polymers with m = 3 (∙) and 5

end-segments comprise all the arm segments. Density of the end-segments for both
the molecular topologies are higher near the surface compared to the mid-segments.
On the contrary, densities of the mid-segments are enhanced at z = 1
σ. Both the
end- and mid-segment densities of the linear polymer near the surface are higher than
those of the 3-arm star polymer, due to higher conformational restriction on the star
polymer to pack against the surface. This is also observed in figures 7.7c and d, where
the average end- and mid-segments densities near the surface of both the 3-arm and
4-arm star polymers are lower than that of the linear polymer. Comparison of the
end- and mid-segments density profile of the star polymer fluids themselves, shows
that as the number of arms in the star polymer increases (keeping the total number of

204



More intriguing information

1. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
2. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
3. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
4. The name is absent
5. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
6. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
7. The name is absent
8. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
9. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
10. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS